Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Nottingham Forest

Serge Aurier

Defender
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.020 non-penalty goals from 6 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.062 assists, 3 key passes
Finishing
-0.19goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.232% of Nottingham Forest’s build-up value

Serge Aurier ranks 300th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 17.4m on average, with 86% of their danger coming from set pieces.

Against their position

135 defenders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.00
Non-penalty goals
0.00
xG
0.02
Non-penalty xG
0.02
Shots
0.64
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
-0.2

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.21
Expected assists
0.06
Key passes
0.32
npxG + xA
0.09
xG chain
0.29
xG build-up
0.23
Assists against xA
+1.4

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
2season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Ranked against 135 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 7

Next fixture

Gameweek 7

vs Arsenal

Sun 18 Oct, 15:30 UTC

Arsenal concede 8.6 shots a match and are 0.64× the league norm against defenders. A difficult one.

Projected shots
0.41

0.64 per 90 × 0.63

Projected on target
0.05

0.11 per 90 × 0.46

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

12 appearances
  • Over 0.55 of 1242%± 14
  • Over 1.51 of 128%± 8
  • Over 2.50 of 120%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 120%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 7 of 12.

Shooting profile

6 shots

Where they shoot

6 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Serge Aurier, 2023/24, 6 shots in the final 35m, 0 scored.

left
44%
Centre
30%
right
25%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.034
Shots per 90
0.64
Key passes per 90
0.32
Average shot distance
17.4m
From set pieces
86%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
37%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%

Club role

Nottingham Forest

What they are for

  • On the pitch25% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Serge Aurier’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Morgan Gibbs-White0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  2. Harry Toffolo0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Joe Worrall0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Orel Mangala0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Murillo0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Taiwo Awoniyi0.5 xG1 shot, 1g
  2. Chris Wood0.1 xG1 shot, 1g
  3. Anthony Elanga0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2023/24

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Serge Aurier carries 2.3% of Nottingham Forest’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.226
    38% of defenders
  • Possession value per 900.293
    45% of defenders

Ranked against 135 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

12 appearances, oldest first

v Sheffield Utd1 shot
0 on target

at Palace2 shots
1 on target

v Luton1 shot
0 on target

at West Ham1 shot
0 on target

v Everton1 shot
0 on target

7 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 7 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.