-1.06goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.174% of Fulham’s build-up value
league 0.24
Sasa Lukic ranks 159th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 16.8m on average. They carry 6% of Fulham’s attacking involvement, the 8th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
142 midfielders
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.0537th
Non-penalty goals
0.0538th
xG
0.1269th
Non-penalty xG
0.1269th
Shots
0.9442nd
npxG per shot
0.1388th
Shot distance
16.8m79th
Set-piece share
1%2nd
Goals against xG
-1.314th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.1052nd
Expected assists
0.1152nd
Key passes
1.4071st
npxG + xA
0.2359th
xG chain
0.3232nd
xG build-up
0.1719th
Assists against xA
-0.257th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Defending
per 90
Recoveries
3.6926th
Defensive contribution
9.5269th
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
9season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Ranked against 142 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end. Recoveries and defensive contribution come from the FPL feed and are ranked in its own positions.
This week
Gameweek 8
Next fixture
Gameweek 8
vsNottingham Forest
Fri 23 Oct, 19:00 UTC
Nottingham Forest concede 13.3 shots a match and are 1.20× the league norm against midfielders. A favourable draw.
Projected shots
1.06
0.94 per 90 × 1.13
Projected on target
0.26
0.26 per 90 × 1.02
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
26 appearances
Over 0.512 of 2646%± 10
Over 1.55 of 2619%± 8
Over 2.51 of 264%± 4
Over 3.50 of 260%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 14 of 26.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Sasa Lukic, 2025/26, 18 shots in the final 35m, 1 scored.
left
17%
Centre
65%
right
19%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.130
Shots per 90
0.94
Key passes per 90
1.40
Average shot distance
16.8m
From set pieces
1%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
10%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
47%
Club role
Fulham
What they are for
Corners and set piecesSupplies 9% of Fulham’s dead-ball danger, from 12 deliveries that became shots.
On the pitch51% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Sasa Lukic’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Ryan Sessegnon0.6 xG2 shots, 0g
Adama Traoré0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
Timothy Castagne0.2 xG2 shots, 0g
Harry Wilson0.1 xG3 shots, 0g
Antonee Robinson0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Harry Wilson0.6 xG5 shots, 0g
Rodrigo Muniz0.3 xG2 shots, 0g
Raúl Jiménez0.2 xG4 shots, 1g
Sander Berge0.2 xG1 shot, 0g
Joachim Andersen0.2 xG2 shots, 0g
Season record
2025/26
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Sasa Lukic carries 3.9%of Fulham’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.175
18% of midfielders
Possession value per 900.324
32% of midfielders
Ranked against 142 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
26 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
v Leeds1 shot 0 on target
v Brentford3 shots 0 on target
at Villa2 shots 0 on target
1g
at Newcastle1 shot 1 on target
v Forest1 shot 0 on target
at West Ham2 shots 0 on target
at Palace1 shot 0 on target
at Leeds1 shot 1 on target
at Forest1 shot 0 on target
at Brentford1 shot 0 on target
v Villa2 shots 2 on target
v Bournemouth2 shots 1 on target
14 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 14 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.