Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Ipswich

Sasa Lukic

Defensive midfielder30 yrsCorners 1st
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.010 non-penalty goals from 1 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.091 assists, 8 key passes
Finishing
-0.03goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.4912% of Ipswich’s build-up value

Sasa Lukic ranks 94th of 138 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 22.2m on average, with 100% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 8% of Ipswich’s attacking involvement, the 5th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

87 midfielders

Average match rating6.33

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.00
Non-penalty goals
0.00
xG
0.01
Non-penalty xG
0.01
Shots
0.18
Shots on target
0.00
Shot accuracy
–not ranked
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
-0.0

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.18
Expected assists
0.09
Key passes
1.44
npxG + xA
0.10
xG chain
0.57
xG build-up
0.49
Assists against xA
+0.5

On the ball

per 90
Touches
60.33
Passes
50.00
Pass completion
89%
Take-ons attempted
0.33
Take-on success
–not ranked
Dispossessed
0.33

Defending

per 90
Tackles
3.33
Tackles won
50%
Interceptions
1.00
Clearances
2.00
Aerials won
0.33
Aerial success
–not ranked
Dribbled past
1.67

Discipline

per 90
Fouls committed
1.67
Caught offside
0.00
Errors
0season count
Yellow cards
2season count
Red cards
0season count

Ranked against 87 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 8

Next fixture

Gameweek 8

vs Nottingham Forest

Fri 23 Oct, 19:00 UTC

Nottingham Forest concede 11.0 shots a match and are 1.00× the league norm against central midfield (11 shots so far). A difficult one.

Projected shots
0.16

0.18 per 90 × 0.89

Projected on target
0.00

0.00 per 90 × 0.85

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

6 appearances
  • Over 0.51 of 617%± 15
  • Over 1.50 of 60%± 0
  • Over 2.50 of 60%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 60%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 5 of 6.

Shooting profile

1 shots

Where they shoot

1 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Sasa Lukic, 2026/27, 1 shots in the final 35m, 0 scored.

left
100%
Centre
0%
right
0%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.038
Shots per 90
0.18
Key passes per 90
1.44
Average shot distance
22.2m
From set pieces
100%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%

Club role

Ipswich

What they are for

  • On the pitch93% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Sasa Lukic’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Marcelino Núñez0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Jack Clarke0.2 xG2 shots, 1g
  2. Julio Enciso0.2 xG4 shots, 0g
  3. Sindre Egeli0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Jaden Philogene-Bidace0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2026/27

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Sasa Lukic carries 12.1% of Ipswich’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.486
    81% of midfielders
  • Possession value per 900.569
    48% of midfielders

Ranked against 52 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

6 appearances, oldest first

at Man Utd1 shot
0 on target

5 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 5 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.