Small sample. Only 132 minutes this season, so the rates below swing heavily on a handful of moments. Read them as description, not as form.
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.922 non-penalty goals from 4 shots
league 0.15
Expected assists per 90
0.740 assists, 4 key passes
league 0.11
Finishing
+0.71goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.110% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value
league 0.28
Sasa Kalajdzic has not reached the 450-minute floor this season, so they are not ranked against the league yet. They shoot from 10.2m on average. They carry 2% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ attacking involvement, the 15th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
107 forwards
Shooting
per 90
Goals
1.36100th
Non-penalty goals
1.36100th
xG
0.9298th
Non-penalty xG
0.92100th
Shots
2.7366th
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
+0.675th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.006th
Expected assists
0.74100th
Key passes
2.7399th
npxG + xA
1.66100th
xG chain
1.75100th
xG build-up
0.1116th
Assists against xA
-1.126th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
0season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Ranked against 107 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Next match
Shots
11 appearances
Over 0.54 of 1136%± 15
Over 1.50 of 110%± 0
Over 2.50 of 110%± 0
Over 3.50 of 110%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 7 of 11.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Sasa Kalajdzic, 2023/24, 4 shots in the final 35m, 2 scored.
left
0%
Centre
100%
right
0%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.338
Shots per 90
2.73
Key passes per 90
2.73
Average shot distance
10.2m
From set pieces
0%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
55%
Through balls
36%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
16%
Club role
Wolverhampton Wanderers
What they are for
On the pitch4% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Sasa Kalajdzic’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Pedro Neto0.7 xG2 shots, 1g
Hee-Chan Hwang0.5 xG1 shot, 1g
João Gomes0.2 xG1 shot, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Pedro Neto0.6 xG1 shot, 0g
Hee-Chan Hwang0.4 xG2 shots, 0g
Fabio Silva0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Season record
2023/24
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Sasa Kalajdzic carries 0.2%of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value.
Build-up per 900.109
16% of forwards
Possession value per 901.748
100% of forwards
Thin sample. Only 132 minutes, so this describes a cameo. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
11 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
1g
at Everton1 shot 1 on target
v Villa1 shot 0 on target
1g
at Bournemouth1 shot 1 on target
v Spurs1 shot 0 on target
7 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 7 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against. 132 minutes leaves every tie here broken.
