Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Chelsea

Romeo Lavia

Midfielder22 yrs
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.020 non-penalty goals from 2 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.081 assists, 7 key passes
Finishing
-0.13goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.211% of Chelsea’s build-up value

Romeo Lavia ranks 278th of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 17.2m on average, with 56% of their danger coming from set pieces.

Against their position

137 midfielders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.00
Non-penalty goals
0.00
xG
0.02
Non-penalty xG
0.02
Shots
0.22
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
-0.1

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.11
Expected assists
0.08
Key passes
0.76
npxG + xA
0.09
xG chain
0.29
xG build-up
0.21
Assists against xA
+0.3

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
4season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Ranked against 137 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 8

Next fixture

Gameweek 8

vs Tottenham

Sat 24 Oct, 16:30 UTC

Tottenham concede 13.8 shots a match and are 1.06× the league norm against midfielders. Roughly an average matchup.

Projected shots
0.23

0.22 per 90 × 1.06

Projected on target
0.00

0.00 per 90 × 1.07

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

16 appearances
  • Over 0.52 of 1613%± 8
  • Over 1.50 of 160%± 0
  • Over 2.50 of 160%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 160%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 14 of 16.

Shooting profile

2 shots

Where they shoot

2 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Romeo Lavia, 2024/25, 2 shots in the final 35m, 0 scored.

left
0%
Centre
100%
right
0%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.073
Shots per 90
0.22
Key passes per 90
0.76
Average shot distance
17.2m
From set pieces
56%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%

Club role

Chelsea

What they are for

  • On the pitch24% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Romeo Lavia’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Cole Palmer0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Nicolas Jackson0.5 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Cole Palmer0.1 xG3 shots, 1g
  3. Enzo Fernández0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Malo Gusto0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Pedro Neto0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2024/25

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Romeo Lavia carries 1.5% of Chelsea’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.211
    26% of midfielders
  • Possession value per 900.294
    18% of midfielders

Ranked against 137 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

16 appearances, oldest first

v Villa1 shot
0 on target

at Forest1 shot
0 on target

14 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 14 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.