Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Wolverhampton Wanderers

Rodrigo Gomes

Forward
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.223 non-penalty goals from 21 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.010 assists, 3 key passes
Finishing
+0.98goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.102% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value

Rodrigo Gomes ranks 165th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 15.9m on average. They carry 4% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ attacking involvement, the 12th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

109 forwards

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.28
Non-penalty goals
0.28
xG
0.22
Non-penalty xG
0.22
Shots
1.99
npxG per shot
0.11
Shot distance
15.9m
Set-piece share
1%
Goals against xG
+0.7

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.00
Expected assists
0.01
Key passes
0.28
npxG + xA
0.23
xG chain
0.32
xG build-up
0.10
Assists against xA
-0.2

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
0season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Ranked against 109 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Next match

Shots

22 appearances
  • Over 0.512 of 2255%± 11
  • Over 1.55 of 2223%± 9
  • Over 2.54 of 2218%± 8
  • Over 3.50 of 220%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 10 of 22.

Shooting profile

21 shots

Where they shoot

21 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Rodrigo Gomes, 2025/26, 21 shots in the final 35m, 3 scored.

left
33%
Centre
44%
right
24%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.109
Shots per 90
1.99
Key passes per 90
0.28
Average shot distance
15.9m
From set pieces
1%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
21%
Through balls
16%
Own dribble
7%
Headed
6%

Club role

Wolverhampton Wanderers

What they are for

  • When it mattered2 of 3 goals came with the game level or Wolverhampton Wanderers behind.
  • On the pitch28% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Rodrigo Gomes’output.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Tolu Arokodare0.4 xG1 shot, 1g
  2. Mateus Mané0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. David Møller Wolfe0.3 xG1 shot, 1g
  4. Hugo Bueno0.2 xG3 shots, 0g
  5. Ladislav Krejcí0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Mateus Mané0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Emmanuel Agbadou0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Hugo Bueno0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2025/26

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Rodrigo Gomes carries 2.0% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.095
    19% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.320
    15% of forwards

Ranked against 109 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

22 appearances, oldest first
1g

v Everton3 shots
1 on target

at Newcastle3 shots
1 on target

v Leeds1 shot
0 on target

at Sunderland1 shot
0 on target

v Burnley3 shots
1 on target

v Chelsea1 shot
1 on target

1g

v Villa1 shot
1 on target

1g

v Liverpool2 shots
1 on target

at Leeds1 shot
0 on target

v Spurs1 shot
0 on target

v Fulham3 shots
0 on target

at Burnley1 shot
0 on target

10 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 10 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.