+0.92goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.291% of Liverpool’s build-up value
league 0.24
Rio Ngumoha ranks 25th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 18.2m on average. They carry 3% of Liverpool’s attacking involvement, the 12th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
142 midfielders
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.3599th
Non-penalty goals
0.3599th
xG
0.2190th
Non-penalty xG
0.2191st
Shots
2.8099th
npxG per shot
0.0841st
Shot distance
18.2m62nd
Set-piece share
3%6th
Goals against xG
+0.881st
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.1779th
Expected assists
0.3799th
Key passes
2.8099th
npxG + xA
0.5998th
xG chain
0.8498th
xG build-up
0.2961st
Assists against xA
-1.130th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Defending
per 90
Recoveries
3.139th
Defensive contribution
4.945th
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
0season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Ranked against 142 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end. Recoveries and defensive contribution come from the FPL feed and are ranked in its own positions.
This week
Gameweek 8
Next fixture
Gameweek 8
vsBrighton
Sun 25 Oct, 14:00 UTC
Brighton concede 11.7 shots a match and are 0.93× the league norm against midfielders. Roughly an average matchup.
Projected shots
2.60
2.80 per 90 × 0.93
Projected on target
0.97
1.05 per 90 × 0.92
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
19 appearances
Over 0.59 of 1947%± 11
Over 1.55 of 1926%± 10
Over 2.52 of 1911%± 7
Over 3.50 of 190%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 10 of 19.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Rio Ngumoha, 2025/26, 16 shots in the final 35m, 2 scored.
left
60%
Centre
40%
right
0%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.076
Shots per 90
2.80
Key passes per 90
2.80
Average shot distance
18.2m
From set pieces
3%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
0%
Through balls
11%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%
Club role
Liverpool
What they are for
On the pitch15% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Rio Ngumoha’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Mohamed Salah0.4 xG1 shot, 1g
Florian Wirtz0.3 xG4 shots, 1g
Cody Gakpo0.2 xG2 shots, 0g
Milos Kerkez0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Ryan Gravenberch0.1 xG3 shots, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Hugo Ekitike0.6 xG2 shots, 0g
Florian Wirtz0.5 xG1 shot, 0g
Virgil van Dijk0.5 xG2 shots, 0g
Andrew Robertson0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Alexis Mac Allister0.1 xG3 shots, 0g
Season record
2025/26
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Rio Ngumoha carries 1.3%of Liverpool’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.289
61% of midfielders
Possession value per 900.835
98% of midfielders
Ranked against 142 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
19 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
1g
at Newcastle1 shot 1 on target
v West Ham1 shot 1 on target
at Wolves1 shot 1 on target
v Spurs3 shots 1 on target
1g
v Fulham2 shots 2 on target
at Everton2 shots 0 on target
at Man Utd1 shot 0 on target
at Villa3 shots 0 on target
v Brentford2 shots 0 on target
10 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 10 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.