Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Reinildo

Defender32 yrs
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.010 non-penalty goals from 4 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.011 assists, 6 key passes
Finishing
-0.15goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.176% of Sunderland’s build-up value

Reinildo ranks 366th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 19.1m on average, with 35% of their danger coming from set pieces.

Against their position

119 defenders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.00
Non-penalty goals
0.00
xG
0.01
Non-penalty xG
0.01
Shots
0.18
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
-0.2

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.05
Expected assists
0.01
Key passes
0.27
npxG + xA
0.02
xG chain
0.18
xG build-up
0.17
Assists against xA
+0.7

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Defending

per 90
Recoveries
4.12
Defensive contribution
7.51

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
7season count
Red cards
1season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Ranked against 119 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end. Recoveries and defensive contribution come from the FPL feed and are ranked in its own positions.

This week

Gameweek 7

Next fixture

Gameweek 7

away to Bournemouth

Sun 18 Oct, 13:00 UTC

Bournemouth concede 12.6 shots a match and are 0.91× the league norm against defenders. Roughly an average matchup.

Projected shots
0.17

0.18 per 90 × 0.96

Projected on target
0.00

0.00 per 90 × 1.02

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

25 appearances
  • Over 0.54 of 2516%± 7
  • Over 1.50 of 250%± 0
  • Over 2.50 of 250%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 250%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 21 of 25.

Shooting profile

4 shots

Where they shoot

4 shots
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Reinildo, 2025/26, 4 shots in the final 35m, 0 scored.

left
91%
Centre
9%
right
0%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.043
Shots per 90
0.18
Key passes per 90
0.27
Average shot distance
19.1m
From set pieces
35%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
15%

Club role

Sunderland

What they are for

  • On the pitch58% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Reinildo’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Chemsdine Talbi0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Dan Ballard0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Granit Xhaka0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Trai Hume0.2 xG3 shots, 0g
  2. Chemsdine Talbi0.1 xG2 shots, 1g
  3. Enzo Le Fée0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2025/26

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Reinildo carries 6.0% of Sunderland’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.169
    25% of defenders
  • Possession value per 900.180
    15% of defenders

Ranked against 119 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

25 appearances, oldest first

v Brentford1 shot
0 on target

v Everton1 shot
0 on target

v Bournemouth1 shot
0 on target

v Burnley1 shot
0 on target

21 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 21 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.