Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Burnley

Quilindschy Hartman

Defender
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.020 non-penalty goals from 9 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.145 assists, 20 key passes
Finishing
-0.33goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.206% of Burnley’s build-up value

Quilindschy Hartman ranks 230th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 26.8m on average. They carry 4% of Burnley’s attacking involvement, the 14th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

119 defenders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.00
Non-penalty goals
0.00
xG
0.02
Non-penalty xG
0.02
Shots
0.44
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
-0.4

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.24
Expected assists
0.14
Key passes
0.98
npxG + xA
0.15
xG chain
0.26
xG build-up
0.20
Assists against xA
+2.2

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
1season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Ranked against 119 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Next match

Shots

21 appearances
  • Over 0.58 of 2138%± 11
  • Over 1.51 of 215%± 5
  • Over 2.50 of 210%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 210%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 13 of 21.

Shooting profile

9 shots

Where they shoot

9 shots
Every shotBy zone
11% of shots, 1 shot11% of shots, 1 shot11% of shots, 1 shot11% of shots, 1 shot11% of shots, 1 shot11% of shots, 1 shot11% of shots, 1 shot11% of shots, 1 shot11%11%11%11%11%11%11%11%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

Quilindschy Hartman, 2025/26, final 35m. A further 11% of their shots came from outside this window.

left
98%
Centre
0%
right
2%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.042
Shots per 90
0.44
Key passes per 90
0.98
Average shot distance
26.8m
From set pieces
11%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
6%
Through balls
3%
Own dribble
71%
Headed
6%

Club role

Burnley

What they are for

  • Corners and set piecesSupplies 8% of Burnley’s dead-ball danger, from 6 deliveries that became shots.
  • On the pitch54% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Quilindschy Hartman’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Jaidon Anthony0.3 xG2 shots, 0g
  2. Kyle Walker0.0 xG2 shots, 0g
  3. Lyle Foster0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Florentino Luís0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Zian Flemming1.9 xG7 shots, 3g
  2. Chimuanya Ugochukwu0.4 xG1 shot, 1g
  3. Jaidon Anthony0.3 xG4 shots, 1g
  4. Loum Tchaouna0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  5. Hjalmar Ekdal0.1 xG2 shots, 0g

Season record

2025/26

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Quilindschy Hartman carries 5.7% of Burnley’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.199
    32% of defenders
  • Possession value per 900.256
    39% of defenders

Ranked against 119 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

21 appearances, oldest first

at Man Utd1 shot
0 on target

v Forest1 shot
1 on target

at Man City1 shot
1 on target

at Wolves1 shot
0 on target

v Chelsea1 shot
0 on target

at Brentford1 shot
0 on target

at Fulham1 shot
1 on target

v Man City2 shots
0 on target

13 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 13 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.