Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Luton

Pelly Ruddock Mpanzu

Midfielder
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.110 non-penalty goals from 11 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.040 assists, 6 key passes
Finishing
-1.20goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.102% of Luton’s build-up value

Pelly Ruddock Mpanzu ranks 228th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 20.4m on average. They carry 2% of Luton’s attacking involvement, the 13th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

128 midfielders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.00
Non-penalty goals
0.00
xG
0.11
Non-penalty xG
0.11
Shots
0.93
npxG per shot
0.11
Shot distance
20.4m
Set-piece share
5%
Goals against xG
-1.3

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.00
Expected assists
0.04
Key passes
0.51
npxG + xA
0.15
xG chain
0.22
xG build-up
0.10
Assists against xA
-0.5

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
1season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Ranked against 128 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Next match

Shots

27 appearances
  • Over 0.58 of 2730%± 9
  • Over 1.53 of 2711%± 6
  • Over 2.50 of 270%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 270%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 19 of 27.

Shooting profile

11 shots

Where they shoot

11 shots
Every shotBy zone
9% of shots, 1 shot9% of shots, 1 shot9% of shots, 1 shot9% of shots, 1 shot9% of shots, 1 shot18% of shots, 2 shots18% of shots, 2 shots18% of shots, 2 shots9%9%9%9%9%18%18%18%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

Pelly Ruddock Mpanzu, 2023/24, final 35m.

left
12%
Centre
76%
right
12%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.115
Shots per 90
0.93
Key passes per 90
0.51
Average shot distance
20.4m
From set pieces
5%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
5%
Headed
70%

Club role

Luton

What they are for

  • On the pitch31% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Pelly Ruddock Mpanzu’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Issa Kabore0.8 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Carlton Morris0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  3. Cauley Woodrow0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Elijah Adebayo0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Chiedozie Ogbene0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Alfie Doughty0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Cauley Woodrow0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Jacob Brown0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  4. Ross Barkley0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Tahith Chong0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2023/24

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Pelly Ruddock Mpanzu carries 1.9% of Luton’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.103
    5% of midfielders
  • Possession value per 900.224
    8% of midfielders

Ranked against 128 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

27 appearances, oldest first

at Brighton2 shots
0 on target

at Chelsea1 shot
0 on target

v Wolves2 shots
0 on target

v Burnley2 shots
0 on target

at Forest1 shot
0 on target

v Arsenal1 shot
0 on target

at Newcastle1 shot
1 on target

at Man City1 shot
0 on target

19 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 19 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.