+1.19goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.154% of Chelsea’s build-up value
league 0.30
Pedro Neto ranks 16th of 138 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 15.3m on average. They carry 13% of Chelsea’s attacking involvement, the 4th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
87 midfielders
Average match rating7.0668th
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.5295th
Non-penalty goals
0.5296th
xG
0.3594th
Non-penalty xG
0.3595th
Shots
2.0871st
Shots on target
0.6773rd
Shot accuracy
–not ranked
npxG per shot
0.1793rd
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
+1.089th
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.1766th
Expected assists
0.2064th
Key passes
1.9174th
npxG + xA
0.5688th
xG chain
0.5449th
xG build-up
0.1520th
Assists against xA
-0.244th
On the ball
per 90
Touches
25.677th
Passes
13.005th
Pass completion
–not ranked
Take-ons attempted
2.3369th
Take-on success
–not ranked
Dispossessed
0.3373rd
Defending
per 90
Tackles
1.6740th
Tackles won
–not ranked
Interceptions
1.0073rd
Clearances
0.6748th
Aerials won
0.6761st
Aerial success
–not ranked
Dribbled past
1.0024th
Discipline
per 90
Fouls committed
0.6766th
Caught offside
0.0063rd
Errors
0season count
Yellow cards
1season count
Red cards
0season count
Ranked against 87 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Gameweek 8
Next fixture
Gameweek 8
vsTottenham
Sat 24 Oct, 16:30 UTC
Tottenham concede 14.7 shots a match and are 0.98× the league norm against full-backs (8 shots so far). Roughly an average matchup.
Projected shots
2.13
2.08 per 90 × 1.02
Projected on target
0.80
0.87 per 90 × 0.93
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
7 appearances
Over 0.56 of 786%± 13
Over 1.53 of 743%± 19
Over 2.50 of 70%± 0
Over 3.50 of 70%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 1 of 7.
Corners and set piecesSupplies 7% of Chelsea’s dead-ball danger, from 2 deliveries that became shots.
On the pitch96% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Pedro Neto’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Morgan Rogers0.6 xG1 shot, 1g
Cole Palmer0.5 xG3 shots, 0g
João Pedro0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Danny Welbeck0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Enzo Fernández0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
João Pedro0.2 xG3 shots, 1g
Malo Gusto0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Cole Palmer0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Season record
2026/27
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Pedro Neto carries 3.8%of Chelsea’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.154
15% of midfielders
Possession value per 900.538
42% of midfielders
Ranked against 52 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
7 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
at Fulham1 shot 0 on target
1g
v Brighton2 shots 2 on target
at Arsenal1 shot 0 on target
v Hull1 shot 1 on target
at Brentford2 shots 1 on target
v Bournemouth2 shots 1 on target
1 blankno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so one sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.