Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Chelsea

Pedro Neto

Midfielder26 yrs
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.175 non-penalty goals from 46 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.276 assists, 53 key passes
Finishing
+0.45goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.336% of Chelsea’s build-up value

Pedro Neto ranks 60th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 17.9m on average. They carry 10% of Chelsea’s attacking involvement, the 3rd largest share in the squad.

Against their position

109 forwards

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.17
Non-penalty goals
0.17
xG
0.17
Non-penalty xG
0.17
Shots
1.55
npxG per shot
0.11
Shot distance
17.9m
Set-piece share
3%
Goals against xG
-0.1

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.20
Expected assists
0.27
Key passes
1.79
npxG + xA
0.44
xG chain
0.65
xG build-up
0.33
Assists against xA
-1.9

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Defending

per 90
Recoveries
2.88
Defensive contribution
4.18

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
2season count
Red cards
1season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Ranked against 109 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end. Recoveries and defensive contribution come from the FPL feed and are ranked in its own positions.

This week

Gameweek 8

Next fixture

Gameweek 8

vs Tottenham

Sat 24 Oct, 16:30 UTC

Tottenham concede 12.3 shots a match and are 1.05× the league norm against forwards. Roughly an average matchup.

Projected shots
1.57

1.55 per 90 × 1.01

Projected on target
0.43

0.44 per 90 × 0.98

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

34 appearances
  • Over 0.525 of 3474%± 8
  • Over 1.514 of 3441%± 8
  • Over 2.57 of 3421%± 7
  • Over 3.50 of 340%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 9 of 34.

Shooting profile

46 shots

Where they shoot

46 shots
Every shotBy zone
4% of shots, 2 shots2% of shots, 1 shot2% of shots, 1 shot2% of shots, 1 shot7% of shots, 3 shots7% of shots, 3 shots7% of shots, 3 shots2% of shots, 1 shot4% of shots, 2 shots9% of shots, 4 shots7% of shots, 3 shots4% of shots, 2 shots2% of shots, 1 shot2% of shots, 1 shot7% of shots, 3 shots7% of shots, 3 shots2% of shots, 1 shot4% of shots, 2 shots4% of shots, 2 shots7% of shots, 3 shots2% of shots, 1 shot2% of shots, 1 shot4% of shots, 2 shots7%7%7%9%7%7%7%7%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

Pedro Neto, 2025/26, final 35m.

left
21%
Centre
41%
right
38%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.112
Shots per 90
1.55
Key passes per 90
1.79
Average shot distance
17.9m
From set pieces
3%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
10%
Through balls
23%
Own dribble
5%
Headed
16%

Club role

Chelsea

What they are for

  • Open-play crosses7 crosses from open play became shots, worth 1.98 xG.
  • Corners and set piecesSupplies 12% of Chelsea’s dead-ball danger, from 15 deliveries that became shots.
  • When it mattered3 of 5 goals came with the game level or Chelsea behind.
  • On the pitch78% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Pedro Neto’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Enzo Fernández1.5 xG9 shots, 0g
  2. Alejandro Garnacho1.0 xG4 shots, 1g
  3. Jamie Bynoe-Gittens0.6 xG2 shots, 2g
  4. João Pedro0.5 xG3 shots, 1g
  5. Marc Cucurella0.2 xG4 shots, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. João Pedro2.4 xG10 shots, 1g
  2. Cole Palmer1.1 xG10 shots, 1g
  3. Liam Delap1.0 xG7 shots, 0g
  4. Alejandro Garnacho0.9 xG5 shots, 1g
  5. Malo Gusto0.7 xG3 shots, 1g

Season record

2025/26

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Pedro Neto carries 6.0% of Chelsea’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.332
    88% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.650
    78% of forwards

Ranked against 109 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

34 appearances, oldest first

v Palace1 shot
0 on target

1g

at West Ham2 shots
1 on target

at Brentford2 shots
0 on target

v Brighton2 shots
0 on target

v Liverpool1 shot
0 on target

1g

at Forest3 shots
2 on target

at Spurs3 shots
2 on target

1g

v Wolves1 shot
1 on target

1g

at Burnley3 shots
2 on target

v Arsenal3 shots
0 on target

1g

at Leeds1 shot
1 on target

at Bournemouth2 shots
1 on target

v Everton2 shots
0 on target

at Newcastle2 shots
1 on target

v Villa1 shot
0 on target

at Man City1 shot
0 on target

at Fulham3 shots
0 on target

v Brentford1 shot
0 on target

at Wolves3 shots
0 on target

v Burnley1 shot
0 on target

at Arsenal1 shot
0 on target

at Everton1 shot
0 on target

v Man City1 shot
1 on target

v Man Utd3 shots
0 on target

v Spurs2 shots
1 on target

9 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 9 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.