Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Chelsea

Pedro Neto

Midfielder26 yrs
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.184 non-penalty goals from 59 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.266 assists, 46 key passes
Finishing
+0.01goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.275% of Chelsea’s build-up value

Pedro Neto ranks 91st of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 19.2m on average. They carry 9% of Chelsea’s attacking involvement, the 5th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

104 forwards

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.16
Non-penalty goals
0.16
xG
0.18
Non-penalty xG
0.18
Shots
2.37
npxG per shot
0.07
Shot distance
19.2m
Set-piece share
14%
Goals against xG
-0.4

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.24
Expected assists
0.26
Key passes
1.85
npxG + xA
0.44
xG chain
0.58
xG build-up
0.27
Assists against xA
-0.6

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
8season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Ranked against 104 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 8

Next fixture

Gameweek 8

vs Tottenham

Sat 24 Oct, 16:30 UTC

Tottenham concede 13.8 shots a match and are 1.18× the league norm against forwards. A favourable draw.

Projected shots
2.66

2.37 per 90 × 1.12

Projected on target
0.73

0.68 per 90 × 1.07

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

35 appearances
  • Over 0.526 of 3574%± 7
  • Over 1.516 of 3546%± 8
  • Over 2.510 of 3529%± 8
  • Over 3.55 of 3514%± 6

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 9 of 35.

Shooting profile

59 shots

Where they shoot

59 shots
Every shotBy zone
2% of shots, 1 shot5% of shots, 3 shots5% of shots, 3 shots5% of shots, 3 shots10% of shots, 6 shots3% of shots, 2 shots3% of shots, 2 shots3% of shots, 2 shots3% of shots, 2 shots2% of shots, 1 shot8% of shots, 5 shots2% of shots, 1 shot3% of shots, 2 shots14% of shots, 8 shots2% of shots, 1 shot2% of shots, 1 shot2% of shots, 1 shot3% of shots, 2 shots5% of shots, 3 shots7% of shots, 4 shots2% of shots, 1 shot2% of shots, 1 shot3% of shots, 2 shots3% of shots, 2 shots10%8%14%7%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

Pedro Neto, 2024/25, final 35m.

left
34%
Centre
23%
right
43%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.075
Shots per 90
2.37
Key passes per 90
1.85
Average shot distance
19.2m
From set pieces
14%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
20%
Through balls
9%
Own dribble
2%
Headed
3%

Club role

Chelsea

What they are for

  • Open-play crosses12 crosses from open play became shots, worth 1.83 xG.
  • Corners and set piecesSupplies 11% of Chelsea’s dead-ball danger, from 10 deliveries that became shots.
  • When it mattered3 of 4 goals came with the game level or Chelsea behind.
  • On the pitch65% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Pedro Neto’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Cole Palmer0.9 xG9 shots, 0g
  2. Enzo Fernández0.5 xG9 shots, 2g
  3. Marc Cucurella0.3 xG2 shots, 0g
  4. Christopher Nkunku0.3 xG3 shots, 1g
  5. Noni Madueke0.3 xG4 shots, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Enzo Fernández1.7 xG7 shots, 2g
  2. Nicolas Jackson1.0 xG5 shots, 1g
  3. Levi Colwill0.8 xG3 shots, 2g
  4. Malo Gusto0.7 xG5 shots, 0g
  5. Trevoh Chalobah0.6 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2024/25

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Pedro Neto carries 5.0% of Chelsea’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.266
    73% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.580
    41% of forwards

Ranked against 104 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

35 appearances, oldest first

v Man City1 shot
0 on target

v Brighton1 shot
0 on target

at Liverpool1 shot
0 on target

v Newcastle5 shots
2 on target

at Man Utd2 shots
1 on target

1g

v Arsenal3 shots
1 on target

v Villa1 shot
0 on target

at Spurs1 shot
1 on target

at Everton2 shots
1 on target

v Fulham1 shot
0 on target

at Ipswich1 shot
0 on target

at Palace4 shots
0 on target

1g

v West Ham3 shots
1 on target

at Brighton2 shots
0 on target

at Villa4 shots
2 on target

1g

v Southampton1 shot
1 on target

v Leicester1 shot
0 on target

at Arsenal3 shots
0 on target

v Spurs2 shots
0 on target

at Brentford4 shots
2 on target

v Ipswich5 shots
2 on target

1g

at Fulham3 shots
2 on target

v Liverpool3 shots
0 on target

at Newcastle2 shots
0 on target

v Man Utd1 shot
1 on target

at Forest2 shots
0 on target

9 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 9 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.