Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Wolverhampton Wanderers

Pedro Neto

Midfielder26 yrs
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.192 non-penalty goals from 36 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.319 assists, 37 key passes
Finishing
-1.14goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.133% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value

Pedro Neto ranks 66th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 17.9m on average. They carry 9% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ attacking involvement, the 4th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

107 forwards

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.12
Non-penalty goals
0.12
xG
0.19
Non-penalty xG
0.19
Shots
2.13
npxG per shot
0.09
Shot distance
17.9m
Set-piece share
10%
Goals against xG
-1.3

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.53
Expected assists
0.31
Key passes
2.19
npxG + xA
0.50
xG chain
0.51
xG build-up
0.13
Assists against xA
+3.8

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
4season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Ranked against 107 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 8

Next fixture

Gameweek 8

vs Tottenham

Sat 24 Oct, 16:30 UTC

Tottenham concede 12.9 shots a match and are 0.95× the league norm against forwards. Roughly an average matchup.

Projected shots
2.00

2.13 per 90 × 0.94

Projected on target
0.65

0.71 per 90 × 0.92

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

20 appearances
  • Over 0.518 of 2090%± 7
  • Over 1.510 of 2050%± 11
  • Over 2.56 of 2030%± 10
  • Over 3.52 of 2010%± 7

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 2 of 20.

Shooting profile

36 shots

Where they shoot

36 shots
Every shotBy zone
3% of shots, 1 shot3% of shots, 1 shot6% of shots, 2 shots8% of shots, 3 shots8% of shots, 3 shots8% of shots, 3 shots3% of shots, 1 shot3% of shots, 1 shot6% of shots, 2 shots14% of shots, 5 shots14% of shots, 5 shots3% of shots, 1 shot6% of shots, 2 shots3% of shots, 1 shot6% of shots, 2 shots3% of shots, 1 shot3% of shots, 1 shot3% of shots, 1 shot8%8%8%14%14%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

Pedro Neto, 2023/24, final 35m.

left
15%
Centre
43%
right
41%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.091
Shots per 90
2.13
Key passes per 90
2.19
Average shot distance
17.9m
From set pieces
10%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
11%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
17%
Headed
9%

Club role

Wolverhampton Wanderers

What they are for

  • Corners and set piecesSupplies 6% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ dead-ball danger, from 14 deliveries that became shots.
  • On the pitch45% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Pedro Neto’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Sasa Kalajdzic0.6 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Pablo Sarabia0.6 xG6 shots, 0g
  3. Matheus Cunha0.3 xG4 shots, 1g
  4. Jean-Ricner Bellegarde0.2 xG3 shots, 0g
  5. Fabio Silva0.2 xG2 shots, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Matheus Cunha1.9 xG9 shots, 3g
  2. Hee-Chan Hwang0.9 xG4 shots, 3g
  3. Sasa Kalajdzic0.7 xG2 shots, 1g
  4. João Gomes0.6 xG4 shots, 1g
  5. Craig Dawson0.4 xG3 shots, 0g

Season record

2023/24

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Pedro Neto carries 3.1% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.130
    30% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.514
    37% of forwards

Ranked against 107 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

20 appearances, oldest first

at Man Utd3 shots
2 on target

v Brighton2 shots
0 on target

at Everton1 shot
0 on target

at Palace3 shots
2 on target

v Liverpool1 shot
0 on target

1g

at Luton1 shot
1 on target

v Villa1 shot
0 on target

at Bournemouth4 shots
0 on target

v Newcastle2 shots
1 on target

v Everton1 shot
0 on target

at Brighton1 shot
0 on target

1g

v Man Utd3 shots
1 on target

at Chelsea4 shots
2 on target

v Brentford3 shots
2 on target

at Spurs2 shots
0 on target

v Sheffield Utd2 shots
0 on target

v Fulham1 shot
0 on target

at Liverpool1 shot
1 on target

2 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 2 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.