-2.62goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.198% of Leeds’ build-up value
league 0.24
Pascal Struijk ranks 262nd of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 10.0m on average, with 88% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 3% of Leeds’ attacking involvement, the 12th largest share in the squad.
75% chance. Hamstring injury - 75% chance of playing. Weigh the rates below against the chance he features at all. Club status as of 17 Oct 2026.
Against their position
119 defenders
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.0026th
Non-penalty goals
0.0026th
xG
0.0981st
Non-penalty xG
0.0981st
Shots
0.9591st
npxG per shot
0.1039th
Shot distance
10.0m84th
Set-piece share
88%66th
Goals against xG
-3.01st
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.0354th
Expected assists
0.0347th
Key passes
0.3753rd
npxG + xA
0.1263rd
xG chain
0.2229th
xG build-up
0.1930th
Assists against xA
-0.158th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Defending
per 90
Recoveries
3.5948th
Defensive contribution
9.1175th
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
5season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Ranked against 119 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end. Recoveries and defensive contribution come from the FPL feed and are ranked in its own positions.
This week
Gameweek 7
Next fixture
Gameweek 7
vsCrystal Palace
Sun 18 Oct, 13:00 UTC
Crystal Palace concede 11.7 shots a match and are 1.09× the league norm against defenders. Roughly an average matchup.
Projected shots
0.96
0.95 per 90 × 1.01
Projected on target
0.16
0.15 per 90 × 1.02
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
34 appearances
Over 0.521 of 3462%± 8
Over 1.57 of 3421%± 7
Over 2.52 of 346%± 4
Over 3.51 of 343%± 3
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 13 of 34.
Ranked against 119 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
34 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
v Everton1 shot 0 on target
at Arsenal1 shot 1 on target
v Bournemouth1 shot 0 on target
v Spurs3 shots 0 on target
at Burnley2 shots 0 on target
v Villa1 shot 1 on target
at Man City2 shots 0 on target
v Chelsea1 shot 0 on target
v Liverpool1 shot 0 on target
v Palace4 shots 1 on target
at Newcastle2 shots 0 on target
v Fulham1 shot 0 on target
at Everton1 shot 0 on target
v Arsenal1 shot 1 on target
v Forest1 shot 0 on target
v Sunderland1 shot 0 on target
v Brentford1 shot 0 on target
at Man Utd2 shots 1 on target
v Wolves2 shots 0 on target
v Burnley1 shot 0 on target
at Spurs1 shot 0 on target
13 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 13 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.
