Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Wolverhampton Wanderers

Pablo Sarabia

Midfielder
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.253 non-penalty goals from 17 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.222 assists, 15 key passes
Finishing
+1.04goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.212% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value

Pablo Sarabia ranks 69th of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 19.3m on average. They carry 5% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ attacking involvement, the 9th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

137 midfielders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.34
Non-penalty goals
0.34
xG
0.25
Non-penalty xG
0.25
Shots
1.94
npxG per shot
0.13
Shot distance
19.3m
Set-piece share
5%
Goals against xG
+0.8

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.23
Expected assists
0.22
Key passes
1.71
npxG + xA
0.47
xG chain
0.61
xG build-up
0.21
Assists against xA
+0.0

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
2season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Ranked against 137 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Next match

Shots

23 appearances
  • Over 0.513 of 2357%± 10
  • Over 1.54 of 2317%± 8
  • Over 2.50 of 230%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 230%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 10 of 23.

Shooting profile

17 shots

Where they shoot

17 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Pablo Sarabia, 2024/25, 16 shots in the final 35m, 3 scored.

left
55%
Centre
1%
right
43%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.128
Shots per 90
1.94
Key passes per 90
1.71
Average shot distance
19.3m
From set pieces
5%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
24%
Through balls
29%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
8%

Club role

Wolverhampton Wanderers

What they are for

  • When it mattered3 of 3 goals came with the game level or Wolverhampton Wanderers behind.
  • On the pitch23% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Pablo Sarabia’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Matheus Cunha1.0 xG4 shots, 1g
  2. Nélson Semedo0.6 xG3 shots, 0g
  3. Rayan Ait Nouri0.2 xG2 shots, 0g
  4. João Gomes0.1 xG2 shots, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Jørgen Strand Larsen1.0 xG3 shots, 1g
  2. Jean-Ricner Bellegarde0.4 xG2 shots, 1g
  3. Rayan Ait Nouri0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  4. Craig Dawson0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Matheus Cunha0.1 xG3 shots, 0g

Season record

2024/25

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Pablo Sarabia carries 2.1% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.207
    25% of midfielders
  • Possession value per 900.610
    82% of midfielders

Ranked against 137 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

23 appearances, oldest first

at Arsenal1 shot
1 on target

v Chelsea1 shot
1 on target

v Palace1 shot
1 on target

1g

v Southampton1 shot
1 on target

at Newcastle2 shots
2 on target

v Arsenal2 shots
0 on target

at Liverpool2 shots
0 on target

at Bournemouth1 shot
0 on target

v Everton2 shots
0 on target

1g

at Ipswich1 shot
1 on target

v Spurs1 shot
0 on target

1g

at Man Utd1 shot
1 on target

v Leicester1 shot
0 on target

10 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 10 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.