Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Nathan Fraser

Forward

Small sample. Only 175 minutes this season, so the rates below swing heavily on a handful of moments. Read them as description, not as form.

Non-penalty xG per 90
0.220 non-penalty goals from 3 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.030 assists, 2 key passes
Finishing
-0.41goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.090% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value

Nathan Fraser has not reached the 450-minute floor this season, so they are not ranked against the league yet. They shoot from 18.2m on average.

Against their position

107 forwards

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.00
Non-penalty goals
0.00
xG
0.22
Non-penalty xG
0.22
Shots
1.54
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
-0.4

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.00
Expected assists
0.03
Key passes
1.03
npxG + xA
0.26
xG chain
0.34
xG build-up
0.09
Assists against xA
-0.1

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
1season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Ranked against 107 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Next match

Shots

7 appearances
  • Over 0.53 of 743%± 19
  • Over 1.50 of 70%± 0
  • Over 2.50 of 70%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 70%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 4 of 7.

Shooting profile

3 shots

Where they shoot

3 shots
33% of shots, 1 shot33% of shots, 1 shot33% of shots, 1 shot33%33%33%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

Nathan Fraser, 2023/24, final 35m.

left
73%
Centre
0%
right
27%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.144
Shots per 90
1.54
Key passes per 90
1.03
Average shot distance
18.2m
From set pieces
0%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%

Club role

Wolverhampton Wanderers

What they are for

  • On the pitch5% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Nathan Fraser’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Mario Lemina0.4 xG2 shots, 0g
  2. Matt Doherty0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Pedro Neto0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Jean-Ricner Bellegarde0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2023/24

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Nathan Fraser carries 0.2% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.085
    11% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.341
    7% of forwards

Thin sample. Only 175 minutes, so this describes a cameo. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

7 appearances, oldest first

at Newcastle1 shot
1 on target

v Fulham1 shot
1 on target

at Villa1 shot
0 on target

4 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 4 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against. 175 minutes leaves every tie here broken.