Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Nottingham Forest

Murillo

Centre-back24 yrsFree kicks 2nd
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.100 non-penalty goals from 9 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.031 assists, 5 key passes
Finishing
-0.56goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.255% of Nottingham Forest’s build-up value

Murillo ranks 84th of 138 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 13.6m on average, with 70% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 3% of Nottingham Forest’s attacking involvement, the 9th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

81 defenders

Average match rating6.95

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.00
Non-penalty goals
0.00
xG
0.10
Non-penalty xG
0.10
Shots
1.50
Shots on target
0.00
Shot accuracy
–not ranked
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
-0.6

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.17
Expected assists
0.03
Key passes
0.83
npxG + xA
0.13
xG chain
0.31
xG build-up
0.25
Assists against xA
+0.8

On the ball

per 90
Touches
59.00
Passes
42.33
Pass completion
84%
Take-ons attempted
1.67
Take-on success
–not ranked
Dispossessed
0.67

Defending

per 90
Tackles
2.67
Tackles won
–not ranked
Interceptions
0.67
Clearances
6.67
Aerials won
1.33
Aerial success
–not ranked
Dribbled past
0.67

Discipline

per 90
Fouls committed
1.33
Caught offside
0.00
Errors
0season count
Yellow cards
2season count
Red cards
0season count

Ranked against 81 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 7

Next fixture

Gameweek 7

vs Arsenal

Sun 18 Oct, 15:30 UTC

Arsenal concede 10.7 shots a match and are 0.95× the league norm against centre-backs (6 shots so far). A difficult one.

Projected shots
1.29

1.50 per 90 × 0.86

Projected on target
0.12

0.17 per 90 × 0.69

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

6 appearances
  • Over 0.54 of 667%± 19
  • Over 1.53 of 650%± 20
  • Over 2.51 of 617%± 15
  • Over 3.51 of 617%± 15

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 2 of 6.

Shooting profile

9 shots

Where they shoot

9 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Murillo, 2026/27, 9 shots in the final 35m, 0 scored.

left
7%
Centre
73%
right
20%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.069
Shots per 90
1.50
Key passes per 90
0.83
Average shot distance
13.6m
From set pieces
70%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
23%

Club role

Nottingham Forest

What they are for

  • On the pitch100% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Murillo’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Neco Williams0.2 xG3 shots, 0g
  2. Liam Delap0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Ousmane Diomande0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Luca Netz0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Chris Wood0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Nikola Milenkovic0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Neco Williams0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Liam Delap0.0 xG2 shots, 1g

Season record

2026/27

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Murillo carries 5.2% of Nottingham Forest’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.252
    40% of defenders
  • Possession value per 900.306
    38% of defenders

Ranked against 52 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

6 appearances, oldest first

at Liverpool1 shot
0 on target

v Spurs2 shots
0 on target

v Coventry2 shots
0 on target

at Palace4 shots
1 on target

2 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 2 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.