Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Mikkel Damsgaard

Midfielder26 yrs
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.112 non-penalty goals from 35 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.289 assists, 63 key passes
Finishing
-1.14goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.3611% of Brentford’s build-up value

Mikkel Damsgaard ranks 106th of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 17.9m on average. They carry 13% of Brentford’s attacking involvement, the 3rd largest share in the squad.

Against their position

104 forwards

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.06
Non-penalty goals
0.06
xG
0.11
Non-penalty xG
0.11
Shots
1.06
npxG per shot
0.10
Shot distance
17.9m
Set-piece share
13%
Goals against xG
-1.5

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.27
Expected assists
0.28
Key passes
1.90
npxG + xA
0.38
xG chain
0.59
xG build-up
0.36
Assists against xA
-0.2

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
2season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Ranked against 104 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 8

Next fixture

Gameweek 8

away to Hull

Sun 25 Oct, 14:00 UTC

No shot record for Hull in this season, so no opponent adjustment is possible. Newly promoted sides have no Premier League history to measure.

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

38 appearances
  • Over 0.523 of 3861%± 8
  • Over 1.510 of 3826%± 7
  • Over 2.51 of 383%± 3
  • Over 3.51 of 383%± 3

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 15 of 38.

Shooting profile

35 shots

Where they shoot

35 shots
3% of shots, 1 shot3% of shots, 1 shot6% of shots, 2 shots3% of shots, 1 shot3% of shots, 1 shot3% of shots, 1 shot6% of shots, 2 shots14% of shots, 5 shots3% of shots, 1 shot6% of shots, 2 shots6% of shots, 2 shots11% of shots, 4 shots9% of shots, 3 shots3% of shots, 1 shot11% of shots, 4 shots6% of shots, 2 shots3% of shots, 1 shot3% of shots, 1 shot14%11%9%11%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

Mikkel Damsgaard, 2024/25, final 35m.

left
36%
Centre
24%
right
40%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.099
Shots per 90
1.06
Key passes per 90
1.90
Average shot distance
17.9m
From set pieces
13%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
2%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
2%

Club role

Brentford

What they are for

  • Corners and set piecesSupplies 23% of Brentford’s dead-ball danger, from 15 deliveries that became shots.
  • On the pitch87% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Mikkel Damsgaard’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Bryan Mbeumo0.9 xG6 shots, 1g
  2. Vitaly Janelt0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Kevin Schade0.2 xG2 shots, 0g
  4. Yoane Wissa0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  5. Mads Roerslev0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Yoane Wissa3.0 xG17 shots, 1g
  2. Kevin Schade1.7 xG10 shots, 3g
  3. Bryan Mbeumo0.9 xG11 shots, 2g
  4. Nathan Collins0.9 xG4 shots, 1g
  5. Christian Nørgaard0.8 xG7 shots, 0g

Season record

2024/25

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Mikkel Damsgaard carries 11.0% of Brentford’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.358
    91% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.587
    44% of forwards

Ranked against 104 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

38 appearances, oldest first

v Southampton2 shots
1 on target

at Spurs1 shot
1 on target

at Man Utd1 shot
0 on target

v Ipswich2 shots
1 on target

1g

v Bournemouth2 shots
1 on target

at Everton1 shot
0 on target

v Leicester4 shots
0 on target

1g

at Villa1 shot
1 on target

at Chelsea1 shot
0 on target

v Forest1 shot
1 on target

at Brighton1 shot
1 on target

at Southampton1 shot
0 on target

v Man City2 shots
0 on target

v Spurs2 shots
0 on target

at West Ham2 shots
0 on target

v Everton2 shots
0 on target

at Bournemouth1 shot
0 on target

at Newcastle1 shot
0 on target

v Chelsea2 shots
0 on target

at Arsenal1 shot
0 on target

at Forest1 shot
0 on target

at Ipswich2 shots
0 on target

v Fulham1 shot
0 on target

15 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 15 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.