Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Tottenham

Micky van de Ven

Defender25 yrs
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.043 non-penalty goals from 8 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.000 assists, 1 key pass
Finishing
+2.07goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.406% of Tottenham’s build-up value

Micky van de Ven ranks 356th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 15.7m on average, with 81% of their danger coming from set pieces.

Against their position

135 defenders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.12
Non-penalty goals
0.12
xG
0.04
Non-penalty xG
0.04
Shots
0.31
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
+2.0

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.00
Expected assists
0.00
Key passes
0.04
npxG + xA
0.04
xG chain
0.41
xG build-up
0.40
Assists against xA
-0.0

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
5season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Ranked against 135 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 7

Next fixture

Gameweek 7

vs Coventry

Mon 19 Oct, 19:00 UTC

No shot record for Coventry in this season, so no opponent adjustment is possible. Newly promoted sides have no Premier League history to measure.

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

27 appearances
  • Over 0.55 of 2719%± 7
  • Over 1.53 of 2711%± 6
  • Over 2.50 of 270%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 270%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 22 of 27.

Shooting profile

8 shots

Where they shoot

8 shots
Every shotBy zone
13% of shots, 1 shot25% of shots, 2 shots13% of shots, 1 shot13% of shots, 1 shot13% of shots, 1 shot13% of shots, 1 shot13% of shots, 1 shot13%25%13%13%13%13%13%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

Micky van de Ven, 2023/24, final 35m.

left
9%
Centre
43%
right
48%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.121
Shots per 90
0.31
Key passes per 90
0.04
Average shot distance
15.7m
From set pieces
81%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
92%
Headed
0%

Club role

Tottenham

What they are for

  • When it mattered3 of 3 goals came with the game level or Tottenham behind.
  • On the pitch69% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Micky van de Ven’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. James Maddison0.8 xG3 shots, 2g
  2. Cristian Romero0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Son Heung-Min0.0 xG1 shot, 1g
  4. Pape Sarr0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Timo Werner0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2023/24

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Micky van de Ven carries 6.2% of Tottenham’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.400
    75% of defenders
  • Possession value per 900.407
    67% of defenders

Ranked against 135 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

27 appearances, oldest first

at Brentford2 shots
0 on target

1g

at Luton2 shots
1 on target

v Fulham1 shot
0 on target

1g

v Forest1 shot
1 on target

1g

v Burnley2 shots
1 on target

22 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 22 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.