Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Michail Antonio

Forward
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.311 non-penalty goals from 19 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.171 assists, 9 key passes
Finishing
-1.70goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.182% of West Ham’s build-up value

Michail Antonio ranks 67th of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 13.5m on average, with 25% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 5% of West Ham’s attacking involvement, the 7th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

104 forwards

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.10
Non-penalty goals
0.10
xG
0.31
Non-penalty xG
0.31
Shots
1.99
npxG per shot
0.16
Shot distance
13.5m
Set-piece share
25%
Goals against xG
-2.0

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.10
Expected assists
0.17
Key passes
0.94
npxG + xA
0.48
xG chain
0.54
xG build-up
0.18
Assists against xA
-0.6

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
1season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Ranked against 104 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Next match

Shots

14 appearances
  • Over 0.512 of 1486%± 9
  • Over 1.54 of 1429%± 12
  • Over 2.52 of 1414%± 9
  • Over 3.51 of 147%± 7

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 2 of 14.

Shooting profile

19 shots

Where they shoot

19 shots
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Michail Antonio, 2024/25, 19 shots in the final 35m, 1 scored.

left
9%
Centre
39%
right
52%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.158
Shots per 90
1.99
Key passes per 90
0.94
Average shot distance
13.5m
From set pieces
25%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
8%
Through balls
25%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
8%

Club role

West Ham

What they are for

  • On the pitch25% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Michail Antonio’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Jarrod Bowen1.3 xG7 shots, 1g
  2. Konstantinos Mavropanos0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Vladimir Coufal0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Tomas Soucek0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  5. Lucas Paquetá0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Emerson0.6 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Jarrod Bowen0.5 xG5 shots, 0g
  3. Mohammed Kudus0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Tomas Soucek0.1 xG1 shot, 1g
  5. Max Kilman0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2024/25

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Michail Antonio carries 2.3% of West Ham’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.183
    38% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.544
    37% of forwards

Ranked against 104 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

14 appearances, oldest first

v Villa2 shots
0 on target

at Palace2 shots
0 on target

v Man City1 shot
0 on target

at Fulham1 shot
0 on target

v Chelsea1 shot
1 on target

at Brentford3 shots
0 on target

1g

v Ipswich4 shots
2 on target

v Man Utd1 shot
0 on target

at Forest1 shot
0 on target

v Everton1 shot
1 on target

v Arsenal1 shot
0 on target

at Leicester1 shot
0 on target

2 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 2 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.