Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Matthew Cash

Defender29 yrs
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.043 non-penalty goals from 30 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.103 assists, 31 key passes
Finishing
+1.92goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.248% of Aston Villa’s build-up value

Matthew Cash ranks 252nd of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 24.5m on average, with 23% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 3% of Aston Villa’s attacking involvement, the 9th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

119 defenders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.09
Non-penalty goals
0.09
xG
0.04
Non-penalty xG
0.04
Shots
0.89
npxG per shot
0.04
Shot distance
24.5m
Set-piece share
23%
Goals against xG
+1.8

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.09
Expected assists
0.10
Key passes
0.92
npxG + xA
0.13
xG chain
0.30
xG build-up
0.24
Assists against xA
-0.2

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Defending

per 90
Recoveries
2.63
Defensive contribution
5.55

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
9season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Ranked against 119 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end. Recoveries and defensive contribution come from the FPL feed and are ranked in its own positions.

This week

Gameweek 8

Next fixture

Gameweek 8

vs Manchester City

Sat 24 Oct, 11:30 UTC

Manchester City concede 9.8 shots a match and are 0.76× the league norm against defenders. A difficult one.

Projected shots
0.69

0.89 per 90 × 0.77

Projected on target
0.24

0.30 per 90 × 0.81

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

35 appearances
  • Over 0.521 of 3560%± 8
  • Over 1.57 of 3520%± 7
  • Over 2.51 of 353%± 3
  • Over 3.51 of 353%± 3

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 14 of 35.

Shooting profile

30 shots

Where they shoot

30 shots
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Matthew Cash, 2025/26, 30 shots in the final 35m, 3 scored.

left
4%
Centre
10%
right
86%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.041
Shots per 90
0.89
Key passes per 90
0.92
Average shot distance
24.5m
From set pieces
23%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
8%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%

Club role

Aston Villa

What they are for

  • Open-play crosses8 crosses from open play became shots, worth 0.93 xG.
  • Corners and set piecesSupplies 8% of Aston Villa’s dead-ball danger, from 10 deliveries that became shots.
  • When it mattered3 of 3 goals came with the game level or Aston Villa behind.
  • On the pitch89% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Matthew Cash’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Boubacar Kamara0.1 xG5 shots, 1g
  2. Emiliano Buendía0.1 xG3 shots, 1g
  3. John McGinn0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  4. Jadon Sancho0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  5. Ollie Watkins0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Ollie Watkins1.0 xG7 shots, 0g
  2. Amadou Onana0.6 xG2 shots, 1g
  3. Douglas Luiz0.3 xG2 shots, 0g
  4. Morgan Rogers0.3 xG5 shots, 0g
  5. John McGinn0.2 xG3 shots, 1g

Season record

2025/26

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Matthew Cash carries 8.5% of Aston Villa’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.239
    50% of defenders
  • Possession value per 900.305
    61% of defenders

Ranked against 119 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

35 appearances, oldest first

v Palace1 shot
0 on target

1g

at Sunderland2 shots
1 on target

v Fulham1 shot
0 on target

v Burnley1 shot
1 on target

at Spurs2 shots
0 on target

1g

v Man City1 shot
1 on target

at Liverpool2 shots
1 on target

v Bournemouth1 shot
1 on target

at Leeds1 shot
0 on target

v Wolves1 shot
1 on target

1g

v Arsenal2 shots
1 on target

v Man Utd1 shot
0 on target

at Palace1 shot
0 on target

at Newcastle1 shot
0 on target

v Brentford4 shots
1 on target

at Bournemouth2 shots
1 on target

v Leeds1 shot
0 on target

v West Ham2 shots
0 on target

at Forest1 shot
1 on target

v Sunderland1 shot
0 on target

v Liverpool1 shot
0 on target

14 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 14 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.