Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Wolverhampton Wanderers

Marshall Munetsi

Forward
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.242 non-penalty goals from 22 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.171 assists, 9 key passes
Finishing
-0.55goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.112% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value

Marshall Munetsi ranks 101st of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 15.3m on average. They carry 5% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ attacking involvement, the 8th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

104 forwards

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.17
Non-penalty goals
0.17
xG
0.24
Non-penalty xG
0.24
Shots
1.84
npxG per shot
0.13
Shot distance
15.3m
Set-piece share
6%
Goals against xG
-0.8

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.08
Expected assists
0.17
Key passes
0.75
npxG + xA
0.40
xG chain
0.49
xG build-up
0.11
Assists against xA
-1.0

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
0season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Ranked against 104 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Next match

Shots

14 appearances
  • Over 0.510 of 1471%± 12
  • Over 1.58 of 1457%± 13
  • Over 2.53 of 1421%± 11
  • Over 3.51 of 147%± 7

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 4 of 14.

Shooting profile

22 shots

Where they shoot

22 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Marshall Munetsi, 2024/25, 22 shots in the final 35m, 2 scored.

left
32%
Centre
49%
right
19%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.129
Shots per 90
1.84
Key passes per 90
0.75
Average shot distance
15.3m
From set pieces
6%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
5%
Through balls
1%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
11%

Club role

Wolverhampton Wanderers

What they are for

  • On the pitch31% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Marshall Munetsi’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Jean-Ricner Bellegarde1.4 xG4 shots, 1g
  2. Jørgen Strand Larsen0.9 xG4 shots, 1g
  3. Rayan Ait Nouri0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Nélson Semedo0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  5. Toti0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Jørgen Strand Larsen0.9 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Matheus Cunha0.6 xG3 shots, 1g
  3. Gonçalo Guedes0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. João Gomes0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  5. Jean-Ricner Bellegarde0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2024/25

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Marshall Munetsi carries 1.6% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.114
    14% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.494
    28% of forwards

Ranked against 104 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

14 appearances, oldest first

at Liverpool2 shots
1 on target

at Bournemouth2 shots
0 on target

v Fulham2 shots
0 on target

1g

v Everton3 shots
2 on target

v West Ham2 shots
0 on target

at Ipswich3 shots
1 on target

v Spurs1 shot
1 on target

v Brighton4 shots
1 on target

at Palace1 shot
0 on target

1g

v Brentford2 shots
1 on target

4 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 4 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.