Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Brentford

Mads Roerslev

Defender
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.020 non-penalty goals from 5 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.232 assists, 14 key passes
Finishing
-0.20goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.212% of Brentford’s build-up value

Mads Roerslev ranks 151st of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 21.0m on average. They carry 2% of Brentford’s attacking involvement, the 13th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

123 defenders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.00
Non-penalty goals
0.00
xG
0.02
Non-penalty xG
0.02
Shots
0.42
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
-0.2

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.17
Expected assists
0.23
Key passes
1.17
npxG + xA
0.25
xG chain
0.43
xG build-up
0.21
Assists against xA
-0.8

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
2season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Ranked against 123 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 8

Next fixture

Gameweek 8

away to Hull

Sun 25 Oct, 14:00 UTC

No shot record for Hull in this season, so no opponent adjustment is possible. Newly promoted sides have no Premier League history to measure.

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

19 appearances
  • Over 0.54 of 1921%± 9
  • Over 1.51 of 195%± 5
  • Over 2.50 of 190%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 190%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 15 of 19.

Shooting profile

5 shots

Where they shoot

5 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Mads Roerslev, 2024/25, 5 shots in the final 35m, 0 scored.

left
0%
Centre
19%
right
81%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.044
Shots per 90
0.42
Key passes per 90
1.17
Average shot distance
21.0m
From set pieces
7%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%

Club role

Brentford

What they are for

  • On the pitch32% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Mads Roerslev’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Keane Lewis-Potter0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Yoane Wissa0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Bryan Mbeumo0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Mikkel Damsgaard0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Yoane Wissa1.8 xG5 shots, 1g
  2. Fabio Carvalho0.5 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Mikkel Damsgaard0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Keane Lewis-Potter0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Kevin Schade0.1 xG2 shots, 0g

Season record

2024/25

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Mads Roerslev carries 2.3% of Brentford’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.205
    22% of defenders
  • Possession value per 900.432
    70% of defenders

Ranked against 123 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

19 appearances, oldest first

at Liverpool1 shot
0 on target

at Southampton1 shot
1 on target

v Man City2 shots
1 on target

at Palace1 shot
0 on target

15 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 15 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.