-0.94goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.2411% of West Ham’s build-up value
league 0.28
Lucas Paquetá ranks 139th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 17.2m on average, with 49% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 11% of West Ham’s attacking involvement, the 4th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
107 forwards
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.1314th
Non-penalty goals
0.073rd
xG
0.1510th
Non-penalty xG
0.103rd
Shots
1.418th
npxG per shot
0.079th
Shot distance
17.2m33rd
Set-piece share
49%97th
Goals against xG
-1.142nd
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.2064th
Expected assists
0.2063rd
Key passes
1.3864th
npxG + xA
0.3012th
xG chain
0.4520th
xG build-up
0.2460th
Assists against xA
+0.262nd
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
10season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Ranked against 107 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Next match
Shots
31 appearances
Over 0.522 of 3171%± 8
Over 1.514 of 3145%± 9
Over 2.54 of 3113%± 6
Over 3.52 of 316%± 4
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 9 of 31.
Lucas Paquetá, 2023/24, final 35m. A further 2% of their shots came from outside this window.
left
33%
Centre
53%
right
14%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.110
Shots per 90
1.41
Key passes per 90
1.38
Average shot distance
17.2m
From set pieces
49%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
18%
Through balls
7%
Own dribble
17%
Headed
14%
Club role
West Ham
What they are for
PenaltiesTakes them: 2 of 5 West Ham were awarded.
When it mattered3 of 4 goals came with the game level or West Ham behind.
On the pitch78% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Lucas Paquetá’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
James Ward-Prowse0.7 xG6 shots, 0g
Mohammed Kudus0.5 xG4 shots, 0g
Jarrod Bowen0.2 xG4 shots, 0g
Said Benrahma0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Emerson0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Jarrod Bowen1.4 xG8 shots, 2g
Michail Antonio1.1 xG6 shots, 1g
Tomas Soucek0.9 xG5 shots, 0g
Mohammed Kudus0.8 xG7 shots, 3g
Emerson0.7 xG4 shots, 0g
Season record
2023/24
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Lucas Paquetá carries 11.2%of West Ham’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.239
60% of forwards
Possession value per 900.448
20% of forwards
Ranked against 107 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
31 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
at Bournemouth3 shots 0 on target
1g
v Chelsea2 shots 1 on target
at Brighton2 shots 1 on target
v Sheffield Utd1 shot 0 on target
at Villa1 shot 0 on target
v Everton2 shots 0 on target
1g
v Forest2 shots 2 on target
at Burnley1 shot 0 on target
at Spurs2 shots 1 on target
at Fulham1 shot 0 on target
v Wolves2 shots 0 on target
v Man Utd2 shots 0 on target
v Brentford2 shots 0 on target
at Everton2 shots 0 on target
1g
v Burnley4 shots 2 on target
v Villa4 shots 1 on target
at Newcastle1 shot 0 on target
v Spurs2 shots 0 on target
1g
at Wolves1 shot 1 on target
v Fulham3 shots 1 on target
at Chelsea1 shot 0 on target
v Luton1 shot 0 on target
9 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 9 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.