Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Southampton

Kyle Walker-Peters

Midfielder
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.040 non-penalty goals from 20 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.092 assists, 23 key passes
Finishing
-1.05goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.219% of Southampton’s build-up value

Kyle Walker-Peters ranks 243rd of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 19.0m on average. They carry 8% of Southampton’s attacking involvement, the 3rd largest share in the squad.

Against their position

137 midfielders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.00
Non-penalty goals
0.00
xG
0.04
Non-penalty xG
0.04
Shots
0.61
npxG per shot
0.06
Shot distance
19.0m
Set-piece share
2%
Goals against xG
-1.2

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.06
Expected assists
0.09
Key passes
0.71
npxG + xA
0.12
xG chain
0.28
xG build-up
0.21
Assists against xA
-0.8

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
5season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Ranked against 137 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Next match

Shots

33 appearances
  • Over 0.513 of 3339%± 9
  • Over 1.55 of 3315%± 6
  • Over 2.52 of 336%± 4
  • Over 3.50 of 330%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 20 of 33.

Shooting profile

20 shots

Where they shoot

20 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Kyle Walker-Peters, 2024/25, 20 shots in the final 35m, 0 scored.

left
63%
Centre
6%
right
30%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.058
Shots per 90
0.61
Key passes per 90
0.71
Average shot distance
19.0m
From set pieces
2%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
12%
Own dribble
33%
Headed
4%

Club role

Southampton

What they are for

  • On the pitch86% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Kyle Walker-Peters’output.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Flynn Downes0.3 xG3 shots, 0g
  2. Chimuanya Ugochukwu0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  3. Taylor Harwood-Bellis0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Joe Ayodele-Aribo0.1 xG3 shots, 0g
  5. Jan Bednarek0.1 xG2 shots, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Joe Ayodele-Aribo1.1 xG3 shots, 2g
  2. Paul Onuachu0.7 xG4 shots, 0g
  3. Cameron Archer0.3 xG2 shots, 0g
  4. Adam Armstrong0.2 xG3 shots, 0g
  5. Kamaldeen Sulemana0.2 xG3 shots, 0g

Season record

2024/25

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Kyle Walker-Peters carries 8.7% of Southampton’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.213
    28% of midfielders
  • Possession value per 900.280
    14% of midfielders

Ranked against 137 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

33 appearances, oldest first

at Newcastle2 shots
0 on target

v Forest3 shots
1 on target

at Brentford1 shot
1 on target

at Arsenal1 shot
1 on target

v Everton1 shot
0 on target

v Spurs1 shot
0 on target

v West Ham2 shots
2 on target

v Brentford3 shots
0 on target

at Forest1 shot
0 on target

v Newcastle1 shot
0 on target

v Palace1 shot
0 on target

at West Ham2 shots
0 on target

v Fulham1 shot
1 on target

20 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 20 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.