-1.00goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.465% of Manchester City’s build-up value
league 0.27
Kevin De Bruyne ranks 9th of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 21.2m on average. They carry 10% of Manchester City’s attacking involvement, the 2nd largest share in the squad.
Against their position
104 forwards
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.2134th
Non-penalty goals
0.2136th
xG
0.2944th
Non-penalty xG
0.2951st
Shots
3.0181st
npxG per shot
0.1021st
Shot distance
21.2m2nd
Set-piece share
12%34th
Goals against xG
-1.533rd
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.3790th
Expected assists
0.4798th
Key passes
3.0199th
npxG + xA
0.7692nd
xG chain
0.9996th
xG build-up
0.4699th
Assists against xA
-1.913th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
2season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Ranked against 104 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Gameweek 8
Next fixture
Gameweek 8
away toAston Villa
Sat 24 Oct, 11:30 UTC
Aston Villa concede 12.2 shots a match and are 0.88× the league norm against forwards. A difficult one.
Projected shots
2.74
3.01 per 90 × 0.91
Projected on target
0.73
0.79 per 90 × 0.92
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
28 appearances
Over 0.523 of 2882%± 7
Over 1.516 of 2857%± 9
Over 2.57 of 2825%± 8
Over 3.55 of 2818%± 7
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 5 of 28.
Open-play crosses5 crosses from open play became shots, worth 1.32 xG.
Corners and set piecesSupplies 16% of Manchester City’s dead-ball danger, from 23 deliveries that became shots.
When it mattered3 of 4 goals came with the game level or Manchester City behind.
On the pitch50% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Kevin De Bruyne’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Jéremy Doku1.0 xG4 shots, 2g
Omar Marmoush0.7 xG2 shots, 0g
Sávio0.5 xG4 shots, 1g
James McAtee0.4 xG1 shot, 0g
Bernardo Silva0.3 xG8 shots, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Erling Haaland2.4 xG12 shots, 1g
Phil Foden1.6 xG4 shots, 3g
Bernardo Silva1.1 xG4 shots, 1g
Omar Marmoush1.0 xG3 shots, 0g
Rúben Dias0.6 xG4 shots, 0g
Season record
2024/25
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Kevin De Bruyne carries 4.9%of Manchester City’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.459
98% of forwards
Possession value per 900.992
95% of forwards
Ranked against 104 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
28 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
at Chelsea2 shots 0 on target
1g
v Ipswich4 shots 1 on target
at West Ham6 shots 2 on target
v Brentford2 shots 0 on target
at Brighton1 shot 0 on target
v Spurs1 shot 0 on target
at Liverpool1 shot 1 on target
1g
v Forest5 shots 2 on target
at Palace1 shot 0 on target
v Man Utd2 shots 1 on target
at Leicester2 shots 0 on target
v West Ham1 shot 1 on target
at Brentford3 shots 0 on target
at Ipswich2 shots 0 on target
v Liverpool2 shots 0 on target
at Forest2 shots 1 on target
at Man Utd2 shots 2 on target
1g
v Palace6 shots 1 on target
at Everton2 shots 0 on target
v Villa1 shot 1 on target
1g
v Wolves1 shot 1 on target
at Southampton5 shots 1 on target
v Bournemouth3 shots 0 on target
5 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 5 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.