Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Ipswich

Julio Enciso

Attacking midfielder22 yrs
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.220 non-penalty goals from 19 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.232 assists, 7 key passes
Finishing
-1.24goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.3811% of Ipswich’s build-up value

Julio Enciso ranks 31st of 138 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 22.2m on average. They carry 17% of Ipswich’s attacking involvement, the largest share in the squad.

Against their position

87 midfielders

Average match rating6.87

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.00
Non-penalty goals
0.00
xG
0.22
Non-penalty xG
0.22
Shots
3.00
Shots on target
1.00
Shot accuracy
25%not ranked
npxG per shot
0.07
Shot distance
22.2m
Set-piece share
0%
Goals against xG
-1.4

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.32
Expected assists
0.23
Key passes
1.11
npxG + xA
0.45
xG chain
0.78
xG build-up
0.38
Assists against xA
+0.6

On the ball

per 90
Touches
50.33
Passes
27.67
Pass completion
88%
Take-ons attempted
6.67
Take-on success
35%
Dispossessed
2.33

Defending

per 90
Tackles
1.00
Tackles won
–not ranked
Interceptions
1.00
Clearances
0.33
Aerials won
0.00
Aerial success
–not ranked
Dribbled past
0.33

Discipline

per 90
Fouls committed
0.33
Caught offside
0.33
Errors
0season count
Yellow cards
1season count
Red cards
0season count

Ranked against 87 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 8

Next fixture

Gameweek 8

vs Nottingham Forest

Fri 23 Oct, 19:00 UTC

Nottingham Forest concede 11.0 shots a match and are 0.86× the league norm against central attack (18 shots so far). A difficult one.

Projected shots
2.48

3.00 per 90 × 0.83

Projected on target
0.67

0.79 per 90 × 0.85

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

7 appearances
  • Over 0.56 of 786%± 13
  • Over 1.56 of 786%± 13
  • Over 2.54 of 757%± 19
  • Over 3.51 of 714%± 13

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 1 of 7.

Shooting profile

19 shots

Where they shoot

19 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Julio Enciso, 2026/27, 19 shots in the final 35m, 0 scored.

left
27%
Centre
54%
right
19%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.073
Shots per 90
3.00
Key passes per 90
1.11
Average shot distance
22.2m
From set pieces
0%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
13%
Through balls
15%
Own dribble
1%
Headed
0%

Club role

Ipswich

What they are for

  • On the pitch100% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Julio Enciso’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Emersonn0.7 xG4 shots, 0g
  2. Sasa Lukic0.2 xG4 shots, 0g
  3. Jack Clarke0.2 xG3 shots, 0g
  4. Abdul Fatawu0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  5. Exequiel Palacios0.1 xG3 shots, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Emersonn0.9 xG3 shots, 1g
  2. Chuba Akpom0.4 xG1 shot, 1g
  3. Leif Davis0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Abdul Fatawu0.0 xG2 shots, 0g

Season record

2026/27

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Julio Enciso carries 10.9% of Ipswich’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.382
    63% of midfielders
  • Possession value per 900.779
    79% of midfielders

Ranked against 52 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

7 appearances, oldest first

v Sunderland3 shots
0 on target

at Man Utd3 shots
1 on target

v Liverpool6 shots
2 on target

at Palace2 shots
0 on target

at Everton3 shots
1 on target

v Fulham2 shots
1 on target

1 blankno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so one sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.