Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Liverpool

Joseph Gomez

Defender29 yrs
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.030 non-penalty goals from 4 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.192 assists, 5 key passes
Finishing
-0.18goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.482% of Liverpool’s build-up value

Joseph Gomez ranks 169th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 19.0m on average, with 72% of their danger coming from set pieces.

Against their position

119 defenders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.00
Non-penalty goals
0.00
xG
0.03
Non-penalty xG
0.03
Shots
0.62
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
-0.2

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.31
Expected assists
0.19
Key passes
0.78
npxG + xA
0.23
xG chain
0.68
xG build-up
0.48
Assists against xA
+0.8

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Defending

per 90
Recoveries
3.03
Defensive contribution
6.97

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
4season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Ranked against 119 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end. Recoveries and defensive contribution come from the FPL feed and are ranked in its own positions.

This week

Gameweek 8

Next fixture

Gameweek 8

vs Brighton

Sun 25 Oct, 14:00 UTC

Brighton concede 11.7 shots a match and are 0.87× the league norm against defenders. A difficult one.

Projected shots
0.56

0.62 per 90 × 0.90

Projected on target
0.00

0.00 per 90 × 0.92

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

21 appearances
  • Over 0.53 of 2114%± 8
  • Over 1.51 of 215%± 5
  • Over 2.50 of 210%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 210%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 18 of 21.

Shooting profile

4 shots

Where they shoot

4 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Joseph Gomez, 2025/26, 4 shots in the final 35m, 0 scored.

left
29%
Centre
0%
right
71%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.050
Shots per 90
0.62
Key passes per 90
0.78
Average shot distance
19.0m
From set pieces
72%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%

Club role

Liverpool

What they are for

  • On the pitch17% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Joseph Gomez’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Ryan Gravenberch0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Mohamed Salah0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Alexis Mac Allister0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Cody Gakpo0.8 xG2 shots, 1g
  2. Hugo Ekitike0.4 xG2 shots, 1g
  3. Alexis Mac Allister0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2025/26

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Joseph Gomez carries 2.5% of Liverpool’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.483
    94% of defenders
  • Possession value per 900.677
    98% of defenders

Ranked against 119 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

21 appearances, oldest first

v Sunderland1 shot
0 on target

v West Ham1 shot
0 on target

at Villa2 shots
0 on target

18 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 18 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.