+0.12goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.184% of Luton’s build-up value
league 0.28
Jordan Clark ranks 195th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 16.8m on average, with 29% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 4% of Luton’s attacking involvement, the 9th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
128 midfielders
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.0750th
Non-penalty goals
0.0750th
xG
0.0637th
Non-penalty xG
0.0637th
Shots
1.1549th
npxG per shot
0.0522nd
Shot distance
16.8m82nd
Set-piece share
29%67th
Goals against xG
+0.169th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.0750th
Expected assists
0.1364th
Key passes
0.8138th
npxG + xA
0.1949th
xG chain
0.3023rd
xG build-up
0.1817th
Assists against xA
-0.830th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
4season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Ranked against 128 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Next match
Shots
23 appearances
Over 0.510 of 2343%± 10
Over 1.55 of 2322%± 9
Over 2.52 of 239%± 6
Over 3.50 of 230%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 13 of 23.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Jordan Clark, 2023/24, 17 shots in the final 35m, 1 scored.
left
33%
Centre
19%
right
48%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.054
Shots per 90
1.15
Key passes per 90
0.81
Average shot distance
16.8m
From set pieces
29%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
8%
Through balls
9%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
5%
Club role
Luton
What they are for
On the pitch39% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Jordan Clark’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Chiedozie Ogbene0.2 xG2 shots, 0g
Ross Barkley0.2 xG3 shots, 0g
Luke Berry0.1 xG1 shot, 1g
Alfie Doughty0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Andros Townsend0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Tahith Chong0.7 xG3 shots, 1g
Carlton Morris0.6 xG3 shots, 0g
Elijah Adebayo0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
Chiedozie Ogbene0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Ross Barkley0.0 xG2 shots, 0g
Season record
2023/24
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Jordan Clark carries 4.1%of Luton’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.177
16% of midfielders
Possession value per 900.297
23% of midfielders
Ranked against 128 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
23 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
at Burnley2 shots 0 on target
v Brighton2 shots 1 on target
at Palace1 shot 0 on target
v Forest2 shots 0 on target
at Spurs1 shot 1 on target
at Arsenal1 shot 0 on target
1g
v Bournemouth3 shots 1 on target
v Brentford1 shot 0 on target
at Wolves1 shot 1 on target
v Fulham3 shots 0 on target
13 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 13 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.
