+0.77goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.144% of Leicester’s build-up value
league 0.27
Jordan Ayew ranks 137th of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 17.8m on average, with 35% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 8% of Leicester’s attacking involvement, the 6th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
104 forwards
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.2744th
Non-penalty goals
0.2138th
xG
0.2326th
Non-penalty xG
0.1922nd
Shots
1.7623rd
npxG per shot
0.1128th
Shot distance
17.8m30th
Set-piece share
35%89th
Goals against xG
+0.474th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.008th
Expected assists
0.1025th
Key passes
0.9133rd
npxG + xA
0.2915th
xG chain
0.314th
xG build-up
0.1425th
Assists against xA
-1.915th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
6season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Ranked against 104 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Next match
Shots
31 appearances
Over 0.521 of 3168%± 8
Over 1.58 of 3126%± 8
Over 2.52 of 316%± 4
Over 3.51 of 313%± 3
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 10 of 31.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Jordan Ayew, 2024/25, 33 shots in the final 35m, 5 scored.
left
34%
Centre
53%
right
13%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.132
Shots per 90
1.76
Key passes per 90
0.91
Average shot distance
17.8m
From set pieces
35%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
25%
Through balls
36%
Own dribble
4%
Headed
3%
Club role
Leicester
What they are for
PenaltiesTakes them: 1 of 3 Leicester were awarded.
Corners and set piecesSupplies 12% of Leicester’s dead-ball danger, from 7 deliveries that became shots.
When it mattered4 of 5 goals came with the game level or Leicester behind.
On the pitch49% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Jordan Ayew’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Facundo Buonanotte0.6 xG2 shots, 0g
Jamie Vardy0.6 xG2 shots, 1g
Jefferson Lerma0.5 xG1 shot, 0g
Wilfred Ndidi0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
Harry Winks0.1 xG2 shots, 1g
Chances created
who they supply
Jamie Vardy0.9 xG6 shots, 0g
Wilfred Ndidi0.4 xG1 shot, 0g
Stephy Mavididi0.3 xG3 shots, 0g
Wout Faes0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
James Justin0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Season record
2024/25
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Jordan Ayew carries 3.7%of Leicester’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.144
25% of forwards
Possession value per 900.310
4% of forwards
Ranked against 104 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
31 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
at Brentford1 shot 0 on target
at Fulham1 shot 0 on target
v Villa1 shot 0 on target
at Palace2 shots 1 on target
v Everton2 shots 0 on target
1g
at Southampton1 shot 1 on target
1g
at Ipswich5 shots 1 on target
at Man Utd1 shot 1 on target
1g
v Chelsea1 shot 1 on target
at Brentford1 shot 0 on target
v Brighton1 shot 0 on target
v Wolves1 shot 0 on target
1g
at Liverpool1 shot 1 on target
v Palace1 shot 1 on target
v Fulham3 shots 1 on target
at Spurs2 shots 0 on target
at Everton2 shots 0 on target
at Wolves1 shot 0 on target
1g
v Southampton2 shots 1 on target
v Ipswich1 shot 0 on target
at Bournemouth2 shots 0 on target
10 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 10 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.
