-0.07goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.054% of Hull’s build-up value
league 0.30
John Egan ranks 120th of 138 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 26.2m on average, with 29% of their danger coming from set pieces.
Against their position
81 defenders
Average match rating7.3893rd
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.0038th
Non-penalty goals
0.0038th
xG
0.0124th
Non-penalty xG
0.0124th
Shots
0.4335th
Shots on target
0.0031st
Shot accuracy
–not ranked
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
-0.151st
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.0039th
Expected assists
0.0125th
Key passes
0.1414th
npxG + xA
0.0212th
xG chain
0.073rd
xG build-up
0.054th
Assists against xA
-0.149th
On the ball
per 90
Touches
42.0023rd
Passes
26.0026th
Pass completion
74%9th
Take-ons attempted
0.0013th
Take-on success
–not ranked
Dispossessed
0.3341st
Defending
per 90
Tackles
1.6748th
Tackles won
–not ranked
Interceptions
1.3378th
Clearances
9.3398th
Aerials won
2.3369th
Aerial success
70%63rd
Dribbled past
0.0086th
Discipline
per 90
Fouls committed
0.3378th
Caught offside
0.0060th
Errors
0season count
Yellow cards
1season count
Red cards
0season count
Ranked against 81 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Gameweek 8
Next fixture
Gameweek 8
vsBrentford
Sun 25 Oct, 14:00 UTC
Brentford concede 14.5 shots a match and are 0.91× the league norm against centre-backs (4 shots so far). Roughly an average matchup.
Projected shots
0.42
0.43 per 90 × 0.98
Projected on target
0.16
0.14 per 90 × 1.08
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
7 appearances
Over 0.53 of 743%± 19
Over 1.50 of 70%± 0
Over 2.50 of 70%± 0
Over 3.50 of 70%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 4 of 7.
John Egan, 2026/27, final 35m. A further 33% of their shots came from outside this window.
left
65%
Centre
7%
right
29%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.027
Shots per 90
0.43
Key passes per 90
0.14
Average shot distance
26.2m
From set pieces
29%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%
Club role
Hull
What they are for
On the pitch100% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of John Egan’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Mohamed Ali-Cho0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Joe Gelhardt0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Season record
2026/27
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
John Egan carries 4.0%of Hull’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.052
4% of defenders
Possession value per 900.069
2% of defenders
Ranked against 52 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
7 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
at Chelsea1 shot 0 on target
at Newcastle1 shot 1 on target
v Everton1 shot 0 on target
4 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 4 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.