Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Burnley

Johann Berg Gudmundsson

Forward
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.161 non-penalty goals from 15 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.243 assists, 34 key passes
Finishing
-0.95goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.234% of Burnley’s build-up value

Johann Berg Gudmundsson ranks 96th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 16.8m on average. They carry 7% of Burnley’s attacking involvement, the 6th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

107 forwards

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.08
Non-penalty goals
0.08
xG
0.16
Non-penalty xG
0.16
Shots
1.15
npxG per shot
0.14
Shot distance
16.8m
Set-piece share
3%
Goals against xG
-1.0

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.23
Expected assists
0.24
Key passes
2.60
npxG + xA
0.40
xG chain
0.48
xG build-up
0.23
Assists against xA
-0.1

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
2season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Ranked against 107 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Next match

Shots

26 appearances
  • Over 0.510 of 2638%± 10
  • Over 1.53 of 2612%± 6
  • Over 2.52 of 268%± 5
  • Over 3.50 of 260%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 16 of 26.

Shooting profile

15 shots

Where they shoot

15 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Johann Berg Gudmundsson, 2023/24, 15 shots in the final 35m, 1 scored.

left
9%
Centre
29%
right
61%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.137
Shots per 90
1.15
Key passes per 90
2.60
Average shot distance
16.8m
From set pieces
3%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
23%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
19%

Club role

Burnley

What they are for

  • Corners and set piecesSupplies 14% of Burnley’s dead-ball danger, from 17 deliveries that became shots.
  • On the pitch34% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Johann Berg Gudmundsson’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Wilson Odobert0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Charlie Taylor0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  3. Sander Berge0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  4. Luca Koleosho0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Josh Cullen0.1 xG1 shot, 1g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Zeki Amdouni0.8 xG6 shots, 0g
  2. Lyle Foster0.6 xG4 shots, 2g
  3. Jay Rodriguez0.5 xG3 shots, 0g
  4. Dara O'Shea0.4 xG6 shots, 1g
  5. Vitinho0.2 xG2 shots, 0g

Season record

2023/24

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Johann Berg Gudmundsson carries 4.3% of Burnley’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.229
    56% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.482
    28% of forwards

Ranked against 107 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

26 appearances, oldest first

v Palace3 shots
0 on target

at Arsenal1 shot
1 on target

v West Ham1 shot
1 on target

v Sheffield Utd1 shot
0 on target

at Brighton1 shot
0 on target

v Liverpool1 shot
0 on target

v Luton2 shots
1 on target

1g

at Sheffield Utd3 shots
2 on target

v Newcastle1 shot
0 on target

v Forest1 shot
1 on target

16 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 16 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.