+1.47goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.495% of Manchester City’s build-up value
league 0.24
Jéremy Doku ranks 27th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 17.7m on average. They carry 8% of Manchester City’s attacking involvement, the 7th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
109 forwards
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.2552nd
Non-penalty goals
0.2557th
xG
0.2031st
Non-penalty xG
0.2034th
Shots
1.9742nd
npxG per shot
0.1029th
Shot distance
17.7m32nd
Set-piece share
5%13th
Goals against xG
+1.086th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.2588th
Expected assists
0.3899th
Key passes
2.9899th
npxG + xA
0.5878th
xG chain
0.9595th
xG build-up
0.4999th
Assists against xA
-2.65th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Defending
per 90
Recoveries
4.4750th
Defensive contribution
6.4024th
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
0season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Ranked against 109 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end. Recoveries and defensive contribution come from the FPL feed and are ranked in its own positions.
This week
Gameweek 8
Next fixture
Gameweek 8
away toAston Villa
Sat 24 Oct, 11:30 UTC
Aston Villa concede 13.0 shots a match and are 0.91× the league norm against forwards. Roughly an average matchup.
Projected shots
1.91
1.97 per 90 × 0.97
Projected on target
0.79
0.76 per 90 × 1.05
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
30 appearances
Over 0.521 of 3070%± 8
Over 1.511 of 3037%± 9
Over 2.56 of 3020%± 7
Over 3.51 of 303%± 3
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 9 of 30.
Open-play crosses5 crosses from open play became shots, worth 0.84 xG.
When it mattered3 of 5 goals came with the game level or Manchester City behind.
On the pitch52% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Jéremy Doku’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Tijjani Reijnders0.9 xG3 shots, 0g
Nathan Aké0.5 xG2 shots, 0g
Bernardo Silva0.3 xG6 shots, 0g
Erling Haaland0.2 xG2 shots, 0g
Mathis Cherki0.2 xG3 shots, 1g
Chances created
who they supply
Erling Haaland3.2 xG17 shots, 4g
Phil Foden1.2 xG6 shots, 1g
Nico O'Reilly1.1 xG7 shots, 0g
Mathis Cherki0.9 xG10 shots, 0g
Tijjani Reijnders0.4 xG7 shots, 0g
Season record
2025/26
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Jéremy Doku carries 4.7%of Manchester City’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.490
98% of forwards
Possession value per 900.951
94% of forwards
Ranked against 109 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
30 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
at Arsenal1 shot 0 on target
v Burnley3 shots 3 on target
v Everton1 shot 1 on target
1g
v Liverpool3 shots 3 on target
at Newcastle1 shot 0 on target
at Fulham3 shots 0 on target
v Sunderland3 shots 1 on target
at Sunderland1 shot 0 on target
v Chelsea1 shot 0 on target
v Brighton2 shots 0 on target
at Man Utd1 shot 0 on target
v Forest1 shot 0 on target
at West Ham1 shot 0 on target
1g
at Chelsea2 shots 1 on target
v Arsenal2 shots 1 on target
at Burnley2 shots 0 on target
2g
at Everton3 shots 2 on target
1g
v Brentford4 shots 2 on target
v Palace1 shot 0 on target
at Bournemouth1 shot 1 on target
v Villa2 shots 0 on target
9 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 9 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.