+1.29goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.343% of Manchester City’s build-up value
league 0.27
Jéremy Doku ranks 105th of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 18.8m on average. They carry 5% of Manchester City’s attacking involvement, the 9th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
104 forwards
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.1829th
Non-penalty goals
0.1831st
xG
0.117th
Non-penalty xG
0.117th
Shots
1.7222nd
npxG per shot
0.073rd
Shot distance
18.8m16th
Set-piece share
12%36th
Goals against xG
+1.179th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.3688th
Expected assists
0.2885th
Key passes
1.9083rd
npxG + xA
0.3925th
xG chain
0.6354th
xG build-up
0.3489th
Assists against xA
+1.490th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
1season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Ranked against 104 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Gameweek 8
Next fixture
Gameweek 8
away toAston Villa
Sat 24 Oct, 11:30 UTC
Aston Villa concede 12.2 shots a match and are 0.88× the league norm against forwards. A difficult one.
Projected shots
1.57
1.72 per 90 × 0.91
Projected on target
0.49
0.53 per 90 × 0.92
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
29 appearances
Over 0.515 of 2952%± 9
Over 1.59 of 2931%± 9
Over 2.53 of 2910%± 6
Over 3.51 of 293%± 3
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 14 of 29.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Jéremy Doku, 2024/25, 29 shots in the final 35m, 3 scored.
left
71%
Centre
8%
right
22%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.065
Shots per 90
1.72
Key passes per 90
1.90
Average shot distance
18.8m
From set pieces
12%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
7%
Headed
0%
Club role
Manchester City
What they are for
When it mattered0 of 3 goals came with the game level or Manchester City behind.
On the pitch44% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Jéremy Doku’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Ilkay Gündogan0.3 xG5 shots, 0g
Erling Haaland0.3 xG1 shot, 1g
Kevin De Bruyne0.2 xG3 shots, 1g
Bernardo Silva0.2 xG2 shots, 0g
Jack Grealish0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Erling Haaland1.3 xG4 shots, 1g
Kevin De Bruyne1.0 xG4 shots, 2g
Rico Lewis0.5 xG1 shot, 0g
Omar Marmoush0.4 xG5 shots, 0g
Sávio0.4 xG2 shots, 0g
Season record
2024/25
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Jéremy Doku carries 3.2%of Manchester City’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.338
88% of forwards
Possession value per 900.626
54% of forwards
Ranked against 104 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
29 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
at Chelsea2 shots 1 on target
at West Ham1 shot 0 on target
v Arsenal2 shots 0 on target
1g
v Fulham1 shot 1 on target
at Wolves3 shots 0 on target
at Bournemouth1 shot 1 on target
at Liverpool1 shot 0 on target
1g
v Forest3 shots 1 on target
v Man Utd1 shot 0 on target
1g
at Ipswich2 shots 2 on target
v Liverpool2 shots 1 on target
at Spurs2 shots 1 on target
at Forest2 shots 1 on target
v Palace1 shot 0 on target
at Fulham5 shots 0 on target
14 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 14 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.