Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Jean-Philippe Mateta

Forward29 yrs
Injured
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.4214 non-penalty goals from 46 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.145 assists, 32 key passes
Finishing
+3.73goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.113% of Crystal Palace’s build-up value

Jean-Philippe Mateta ranks 50th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 12.3m on average, with 21% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 13% of Crystal Palace’s attacking involvement, the 2nd largest share in the squad.

Injured. Hamstring injury - Expected back 18 Oct. The rates below describe what he did, not what he is about to do. Club status as of 18 Oct 2026.

Against their position

107 forwards

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.63
Non-penalty goals
0.55
xG
0.48
Non-penalty xG
0.42
Shots
1.80
npxG per shot
0.23
Shot distance
12.3m
Set-piece share
21%
Goals against xG
+3.2

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.20
Expected assists
0.14
Key passes
1.25
npxG + xA
0.56
xG chain
0.61
xG build-up
0.11
Assists against xA
+1.5

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
3season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Ranked against 107 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 7

Next fixture

Gameweek 7

away to Brighton

Sun 18 Oct, 13:00 UTC

Brighton concede 12.4 shots a match and are 1.04× the league norm against forwards. Roughly an average matchup.

Projected shots
1.74

1.80 per 90 × 0.97

Projected on target
0.96

1.06 per 90 × 0.91

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

35 appearances
  • Over 0.525 of 3571%± 8
  • Over 1.512 of 3534%± 8
  • Over 2.56 of 3517%± 6
  • Over 3.53 of 359%± 5

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 10 of 35.

Shooting profile

46 shots

Where they shoot

46 shots
2% of shots, 1 shot2% of shots, 1 shot4% of shots, 2 shots13% of shots, 6 shots24% of shots, 11 shots2% of shots, 1 shot4% of shots, 2 shots7% of shots, 3 shots17% of shots, 8 shots7% of shots, 3 shots2% of shots, 1 shot4% of shots, 2 shots7% of shots, 3 shots2% of shots, 1 shot2% of shots, 1 shot13%24%7%17%7%7%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

Jean-Philippe Mateta, 2023/24, final 35m.

left
29%
Centre
52%
right
19%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.267
Shots per 90
1.80
Key passes per 90
1.25
Average shot distance
12.3m
From set pieces
21%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
11%
Through balls
20%
Own dribble
4%
Headed
10%

Club role

Crystal Palace

What they are for

  • PenaltiesTakes them: 2 of 4 Crystal Palace were awarded.
  • When it mattered8 of 16 goals came with the game level or Crystal Palace behind.
  • On the pitch67% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Jean-Philippe Mateta’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Eberechi Eze2.1 xG11 shots, 3g
  2. Michael Olise1.5 xG6 shots, 2g
  3. Daniel Muñoz1.4 xG4 shots, 2g
  4. Joachim Andersen0.8 xG3 shots, 1g
  5. Jeffrey Schlupp0.7 xG1 shot, 1g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Eberechi Eze1.4 xG10 shots, 2g
  2. Michael Olise0.7 xG7 shots, 0g
  3. Odsonne Edouard0.5 xG3 shots, 2g
  4. Tyrick Mitchell0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Jeffrey Schlupp0.2 xG2 shots, 0g

Season record

2023/24

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Jean-Philippe Mateta carries 3.0% of Crystal Palace’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.111
    20% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.605
    52% of forwards

Ranked against 107 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

35 appearances, oldest first

v Fulham1 shot
1 on target

v Forest2 shots
1 on target

at Newcastle1 shot
0 on target

at Luton1 shot
1 on target

1g

v Liverpool2 shots
1 on target

1g

at Man City1 shot
1 on target

v Brighton4 shots
1 on target

at Chelsea1 shot
1 on target

v Sheffield Utd1 shot
0 on target

1g

at Brighton1 shot
1 on target

v Chelsea2 shots
1 on target

at Everton2 shots
0 on target

1g

v Burnley2 shots
1 on target

at Spurs1 shot
0 on target

1g

v Luton4 shots
2 on target

1g

at Forest2 shots
1 on target

at Bournemouth1 shot
1 on target

1g

v Man City1 shot
1 on target

at Liverpool3 shots
1 on target

2g

v West Ham3 shots
3 on target

2g

v Newcastle4 shots
3 on target

at Fulham1 shot
0 on target

1g

v Man Utd1 shot
1 on target

1g

at Wolves1 shot
1 on target

3g

v Villa3 shots
3 on target

10 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 10 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.