Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Jay Rodriguez

Forward
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.441 non-penalty goals from 22 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.021 assists, 4 key passes
Finishing
-2.68goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.101% of Burnley’s build-up value

Jay Rodriguez ranks 77th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 12.7m on average, with 32% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 5% of Burnley’s attacking involvement, the 11th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

107 forwards

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.23
Non-penalty goals
0.12
xG
0.53
Non-penalty xG
0.44
Shots
2.54
npxG per shot
0.18
Shot distance
12.7m
Set-piece share
32%
Goals against xG
-2.9

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.12
Expected assists
0.02
Key passes
0.46
npxG + xA
0.46
xG chain
0.46
xG build-up
0.10
Assists against xA
+0.8

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
0season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Ranked against 107 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Next match

Shots

21 appearances
  • Over 0.512 of 2157%± 11
  • Over 1.58 of 2138%± 11
  • Over 2.52 of 2110%± 6
  • Over 3.50 of 210%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 9 of 21.

Shooting profile

22 shots

Where they shoot

22 shots
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Jay Rodriguez, 2023/24, 22 shots in the final 35m, 2 scored.

left
16%
Centre
68%
right
16%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.210
Shots per 90
2.54
Key passes per 90
0.46
Average shot distance
12.7m
From set pieces
32%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
15%
Through balls
13%
Own dribble
3%
Headed
26%

Club role

Burnley

What they are for

  • PenaltiesTakes them: 1 of 3 Burnley were awarded.
  • On the pitch23% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Jay Rodriguez’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Johann Berg Gudmundsson0.5 xG3 shots, 0g
  2. Josh Cullen0.5 xG3 shots, 0g
  3. Charlie Taylor0.4 xG1 shot, 1g
  4. Wilson Odobert0.2 xG2 shots, 0g
  5. Jacob Bruun Larsen0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Aaron Ramsey0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Luca Koleosho0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Wilson Odobert0.0 xG1 shot, 1g
  4. Josh Brownhill0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2023/24

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Jay Rodriguez carries 1.3% of Burnley’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.102
    14% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.460
    22% of forwards

Ranked against 107 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

21 appearances, oldest first

v Villa2 shots
0 on target

v Man Utd1 shot
0 on target

at Luton2 shots
0 on target

v Palace3 shots
1 on target

at Arsenal2 shots
2 on target

1g

v West Ham1 shot
1 on target

1g

v Sheffield Utd2 shots
1 on target

at Wolves1 shot
1 on target

at Brighton2 shots
1 on target

v Everton2 shots
0 on target

at Chelsea3 shots
0 on target

v Brighton1 shot
1 on target

9 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 9 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.