Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Chelsea

Jamie Bynoe-Gittens

Midfielder22 yrs
Injured
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.180 non-penalty goals from 10 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.192 assists, 9 key passes
Finishing
-0.79goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.261% of Chelsea’s build-up value

Jamie Bynoe-Gittens ranks 94th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 21.1m on average.

Injured. Ankle injury - Unknown return date. The rates below describe what he did, not what he is about to do. Club status as of 18 Oct 2026.

Against their position

142 midfielders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.00
Non-penalty goals
0.00
xG
0.18
Non-penalty xG
0.18
Shots
1.98
npxG per shot
0.09
Shot distance
21.1m
Set-piece share
9%
Goals against xG
-0.9

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.40
Expected assists
0.19
Key passes
1.78
npxG + xA
0.37
xG chain
0.58
xG build-up
0.26
Assists against xA
+1.0

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Defending

per 90
Recoveries
2.78
Defensive contribution
5.37

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
0season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Ranked against 142 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end. Recoveries and defensive contribution come from the FPL feed and are ranked in its own positions.

This week

Gameweek 8

Next fixture

Gameweek 8

vs Tottenham

Sat 24 Oct, 16:30 UTC

Tottenham concede 12.3 shots a match and are 1.06× the league norm against midfielders. Roughly an average matchup.

Projected shots
2.02

1.98 per 90 × 1.02

Projected on target
0.39

0.40 per 90 × 0.98

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

16 appearances
  • Over 0.59 of 1656%± 12
  • Over 1.51 of 166%± 6
  • Over 2.50 of 160%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 160%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 7 of 16.

Shooting profile

10 shots

Where they shoot

10 shots
Every shotBy zone
10% of shots, 1 shot10% of shots, 1 shot10% of shots, 1 shot10% of shots, 1 shot10% of shots, 1 shot40% of shots, 4 shots10% of shots, 1 shot10%10%10%10%10%40%10%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

Jamie Bynoe-Gittens, 2025/26, final 35m.

left
93%
Centre
7%
right
0%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.089
Shots per 90
1.98
Key passes per 90
1.78
Average shot distance
21.1m
From set pieces
9%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
20%
Headed
0%

Club role

Chelsea

What they are for

  • On the pitch13% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Jamie Bynoe-Gittens’output.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. João Pedro0.5 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Andrey Santos0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  3. Enzo Fernández0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Trevoh Chalobah0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  5. Marc Cucurella0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Pedro Neto0.6 xG2 shots, 2g
  2. Marc Cucurella0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  3. João Pedro0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Alejandro Garnacho0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Moisés Caicedo0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2025/26

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Jamie Bynoe-Gittens carries 0.8% of Chelsea’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.259
    45% of midfielders
  • Possession value per 900.581
    85% of midfielders

Ranked against 142 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

16 appearances, oldest first

v Palace2 shots
0 on target

v Fulham1 shot
0 on target

at Brentford1 shot
1 on target

v Liverpool1 shot
1 on target

at Spurs1 shot
0 on target

at Burnley1 shot
0 on target

at Leeds1 shot
0 on target

v Everton1 shot
0 on target

v Villa1 shot
0 on target

7 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 7 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.