Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

James Ward-Prowse

Midfielder
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.125 non-penalty goals from 44 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.247 assists, 64 key passes
Finishing
+1.07goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.2111% of West Ham’s build-up value

James Ward-Prowse ranks 109th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 21.4m on average, with 45% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 14% of West Ham’s attacking involvement, the 2nd largest share in the squad.

Against their position

128 midfielders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.21
Non-penalty goals
0.15
xG
0.17
Non-penalty xG
0.12
Shots
1.31
npxG per shot
0.09
Shot distance
21.4m
Set-piece share
45%
Goals against xG
+0.9

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.21
Expected assists
0.24
Key passes
1.90
npxG + xA
0.36
xG chain
0.36
xG build-up
0.21
Assists against xA
-1.1

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
4season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Ranked against 128 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Next match

Shots

37 appearances
  • Over 0.527 of 3773%± 7
  • Over 1.512 of 3732%± 8
  • Over 2.53 of 378%± 4
  • Over 3.51 of 373%± 3

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 10 of 37.

Shooting profile

44 shots

Where they shoot

44 shots
2% of shots, 1 shot2% of shots, 1 shot2% of shots, 1 shot9% of shots, 4 shots2% of shots, 1 shot5% of shots, 2 shots11% of shots, 5 shots2% of shots, 1 shot2% of shots, 1 shot5% of shots, 2 shots2% of shots, 1 shot2% of shots, 1 shot5% of shots, 2 shots9% of shots, 4 shots7% of shots, 3 shots9% of shots, 4 shots5% of shots, 2 shots7% of shots, 3 shots2% of shots, 1 shot5% of shots, 2 shots2% of shots, 1 shot9%11%9%7%9%7%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

James Ward-Prowse, 2023/24, final 35m. A further 2% of their shots came from outside this window.

left
17%
Centre
73%
right
10%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.128
Shots per 90
1.31
Key passes per 90
1.90
Average shot distance
21.4m
From set pieces
45%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
25%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
26%

Club role

West Ham

What they are for

  • PenaltiesTakes them: 2 of 5 West Ham were awarded.
  • Corners and set piecesSupplies 44% of West Ham’s dead-ball danger, from 46 deliveries that became shots.
  • When it mattered7 of 7 goals came with the game level or West Ham behind.
  • On the pitch88% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of James Ward-Prowse’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Vladimir Coufal0.6 xG3 shots, 1g
  2. Lucas Paquetá0.3 xG4 shots, 0g
  3. Mohammed Kudus0.2 xG2 shots, 0g
  4. Michail Antonio0.2 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Emerson0.1 xG3 shots, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Jarrod Bowen2.5 xG13 shots, 1g
  2. Michail Antonio1.3 xG6 shots, 1g
  3. Tomas Soucek1.2 xG10 shots, 1g
  4. Kurt Zouma1.0 xG5 shots, 2g
  5. Lucas Paquetá0.7 xG6 shots, 0g

Season record

2023/24

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

James Ward-Prowse carries 11.1% of West Ham’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.210
    29% of midfielders
  • Possession value per 900.357
    32% of midfielders

Ranked against 128 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

37 appearances, oldest first

v Chelsea1 shot
0 on target

1g

at Brighton3 shots
2 on target

1g

v Man City2 shots
2 on target

v Sheffield Utd2 shots
2 on target

v Newcastle1 shot
0 on target

at Villa1 shot
0 on target

at Brentford1 shot
0 on target

v Forest3 shots
0 on target

at Burnley1 shot
0 on target

v Palace1 shot
0 on target

1g

at Spurs2 shots
1 on target

at Fulham1 shot
1 on target

v Wolves2 shots
1 on target

v Man Utd1 shot
0 on target

at Arsenal1 shot
0 on target

v Brighton1 shot
1 on target

1g

at Sheffield Utd1 shot
1 on target

1g

v Bournemouth1 shot
1 on target

at Man Utd2 shots
0 on target

at Forest1 shot
0 on target

v Brentford2 shots
1 on target

v Villa1 shot
0 on target

v Spurs1 shot
1 on target

1g

at Wolves5 shots
1 on target

v Fulham2 shots
1 on target

at Chelsea2 shots
1 on target

1g

v Luton2 shots
1 on target

10 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 10 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.