Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Brighton

Jakub Moder

Midfielder
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.140 non-penalty goals from 11 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.120 assists, 5 key passes
Finishing
-0.85goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.171% of Brighton’s build-up value

Jakub Moder ranks 159th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 18.2m on average, with 20% of their danger coming from set pieces.

Against their position

128 midfielders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.00
Non-penalty goals
0.00
xG
0.14
Non-penalty xG
0.14
Shots
1.69
npxG per shot
0.08
Shot distance
18.2m
Set-piece share
20%
Goals against xG
-0.9

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.00
Expected assists
0.12
Key passes
0.77
npxG + xA
0.25
xG chain
0.38
xG build-up
0.17
Assists against xA
-0.8

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
2season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Ranked against 128 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 7

Next fixture

Gameweek 7

vs Crystal Palace

Sun 18 Oct, 13:00 UTC

Crystal Palace concede 12.1 shots a match and are 0.92× the league norm against midfielders. A difficult one.

Projected shots
1.52

1.69 per 90 × 0.90

Projected on target
0.38

0.46 per 90 × 0.83

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

17 appearances
  • Over 0.58 of 1747%± 12
  • Over 1.53 of 1718%± 9
  • Over 2.50 of 170%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 170%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 9 of 17.

Shooting profile

11 shots

Where they shoot

11 shots
Every shotBy zone
9% of shots, 1 shot18% of shots, 2 shots9% of shots, 1 shot18% of shots, 2 shots9% of shots, 1 shot9% of shots, 1 shot9% of shots, 1 shot9% of shots, 1 shot9% of shots, 1 shot9%18%9%18%9%9%9%9%9%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

Jakub Moder, 2023/24, final 35m.

left
28%
Centre
2%
right
70%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.081
Shots per 90
1.69
Key passes per 90
0.77
Average shot distance
18.2m
From set pieces
20%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
7%
Headed
4%

Club role

Brighton

What they are for

  • On the pitch17% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Jakub Moder’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Danny Welbeck0.2 xG4 shots, 0g
  2. Pascal Groß0.1 xG3 shots, 0g
  3. Kaoru Mitoma0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. João Pedro0.6 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Adam Lallana0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Carlos Baleba0.1 xG2 shots, 0g

Season record

2023/24

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Jakub Moder carries 0.7% of Brighton’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.173
    13% of midfielders
  • Possession value per 900.384
    40% of midfielders

Ranked against 128 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

17 appearances, oldest first

at West Ham1 shot
0 on target

at Sheffield Utd2 shots
0 on target

v Forest1 shot
1 on target

at Liverpool1 shot
0 on target

at Brentford1 shot
0 on target

v Arsenal1 shot
0 on target

at Burnley2 shots
1 on target

v Man Utd2 shots
1 on target

9 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 9 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.