Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Arsenal

Jakub Kiwior

Defender
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.111 non-penalty goals from 6 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.093 assists, 6 key passes
Finishing
-0.14goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.382% of Arsenal’s build-up value

Jakub Kiwior ranks 184th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 13.1m on average, with 68% of their danger coming from set pieces.

Against their position

135 defenders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.09
Non-penalty goals
0.09
xG
0.11
Non-penalty xG
0.11
Shots
0.57
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
-0.2

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.28
Expected assists
0.09
Key passes
0.57
npxG + xA
0.20
xG chain
0.49
xG build-up
0.38
Assists against xA
+2.1

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
1season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Ranked against 135 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 7

Next fixture

Gameweek 7

away to Nottingham Forest

Sun 18 Oct, 15:30 UTC

Nottingham Forest concede 13.4 shots a match and are 0.76× the league norm against defenders. A difficult one.

Projected shots
0.49

0.57 per 90 × 0.86

Projected on target
0.17

0.19 per 90 × 0.89

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

20 appearances
  • Over 0.55 of 2025%± 10
  • Over 1.51 of 205%± 5
  • Over 2.50 of 200%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 200%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 15 of 20.

Shooting profile

6 shots

Where they shoot

6 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Jakub Kiwior, 2023/24, 6 shots in the final 35m, 1 scored.

left
22%
Centre
78%
right
0%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.199
Shots per 90
0.57
Key passes per 90
0.57
Average shot distance
13.1m
From set pieces
68%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
81%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
81%

Club role

Arsenal

What they are for

  • On the pitch28% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Jakub Kiwior’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Martin Odegaard0.5 xG2 shots, 0g
  2. Declan Rice0.1 xG1 shot, 1g
  3. Kai Havertz0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Kai Havertz0.5 xG1 shot, 1g
  2. Leandro Trossard0.2 xG2 shots, 1g
  3. Gabriel Martinelli0.1 xG1 shot, 1g
  4. Bukayo Saka0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Gabriel Jesus0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2023/24

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Jakub Kiwior carries 2.5% of Arsenal’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.377
    72% of defenders
  • Possession value per 900.489
    76% of defenders

Ranked against 135 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

20 appearances, oldest first

v Fulham1 shot
0 on target

at Luton1 shot
0 on target

v Liverpool1 shot
1 on target

1g

v Newcastle1 shot
1 on target

at Sheffield Utd2 shots
0 on target

15 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 15 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.