+0.68goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.184% of Burnley’s build-up value
league 0.28
Jacob Bruun Larsen ranks 89th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 19.8m on average, with 26% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 8% of Burnley’s attacking involvement, the 5th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
107 forwards
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.4270th
Non-penalty goals
0.3561st
xG
0.3751st
Non-penalty xG
0.3247th
Shots
3.1175th
npxG per shot
0.1029th
Shot distance
19.8m12th
Set-piece share
26%75th
Goals against xG
+0.570th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.006th
Expected assists
0.1021st
Key passes
1.7776th
npxG + xA
0.4233rd
xG chain
0.5239th
xG build-up
0.1844th
Assists against xA
-1.520th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
1season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Ranked against 107 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Next match
Shots
32 appearances
Over 0.523 of 3272%± 8
Over 1.513 of 3241%± 9
Over 2.56 of 3219%± 7
Over 3.52 of 326%± 4
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 9 of 32.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Jacob Bruun Larsen, 2023/24, 44 shots in the final 35m, 6 scored.
left
33%
Centre
27%
right
39%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.120
Shots per 90
3.11
Key passes per 90
1.77
Average shot distance
19.8m
From set pieces
26%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
24%
Through balls
21%
Own dribble
15%
Headed
2%
Club role
Burnley
What they are for
PenaltiesTakes them: 1 of 3 Burnley were awarded.
Corners and set piecesSupplies 6% of Burnley’s dead-ball danger, from 10 deliveries that became shots.
When it mattered5 of 6 goals came with the game level or Burnley behind.
On the pitch37% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Jacob Bruun Larsen’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Sander Berge1.0 xG6 shots, 1g
Wilson Odobert0.9 xG6 shots, 0g
Dara O'Shea0.6 xG2 shots, 2g
Vitinho0.4 xG1 shot, 0g
Arijanet Muric0.3 xG2 shots, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Zeki Amdouni0.4 xG3 shots, 0g
Vitinho0.2 xG3 shots, 0g
Sander Berge0.2 xG4 shots, 0g
Wilson Odobert0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Jay Rodriguez0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Season record
2023/24
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Jacob Bruun Larsen carries 3.6%of Burnley’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.178
44% of forwards
Possession value per 900.517
38% of forwards
Ranked against 107 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
32 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
v Man City1 shot 0 on target
v Spurs1 shot 0 on target
v Man Utd1 shot 1 on target
at Newcastle1 shot 0 on target
1g
at Luton1 shot 1 on target
v Chelsea1 shot 0 on target
1g
v Sheffield Utd4 shots 1 on target
at Wolves2 shots 0 on target
v Everton2 shots 0 on target
v Liverpool1 shot 0 on target
v Arsenal1 shot 0 on target
v Bournemouth2 shots 1 on target
at West Ham2 shots 1 on target
1g
v Brentford3 shots 2 on target
at Chelsea4 shots 1 on target
1g
v Wolves2 shots 2 on target
at Everton1 shot 0 on target
v Brighton1 shot 0 on target
1g
at Sheffield Utd2 shots 1 on target
at Man Utd3 shots 1 on target
v Newcastle3 shots 1 on target
1g
at Spurs3 shots 2 on target
v Forest2 shots 0 on target
9 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 9 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.
