+0.47goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.283% of Ipswich’s build-up value
league 0.27
Jack Taylor ranks 211th of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 23.9m on average, with 42% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 3% of Ipswich’s attacking involvement, the 15th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
137 midfielders
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.1265th
Non-penalty goals
0.1266th
xG
0.0740th
Non-penalty xG
0.0741st
Shots
2.2092nd
npxG per shot
0.035th
Shot distance
23.9m12th
Set-piece share
42%78th
Goals against xG
+0.481st
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.0012th
Expected assists
0.0944th
Key passes
0.5822nd
npxG + xA
0.1638th
xG chain
0.3227th
xG build-up
0.2853rd
Assists against xA
-0.830th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
4season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Ranked against 137 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Gameweek 8
Next fixture
Gameweek 8
vsNottingham Forest
Fri 23 Oct, 19:00 UTC
Nottingham Forest concede 14.0 shots a match and are 1.01× the league norm against midfielders. Roughly an average matchup.
Projected shots
2.29
2.20 per 90 × 1.04
Projected on target
0.45
0.46 per 90 × 0.98
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
32 appearances
Over 0.513 of 3241%± 9
Over 1.54 of 3213%± 6
Over 2.51 of 323%± 3
Over 3.51 of 323%± 3
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 19 of 32.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Jack Taylor, 2024/25, 19 shots in the final 35m, 1 scored.
left
44%
Centre
45%
right
11%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.031
Shots per 90
2.20
Key passes per 90
0.58
Average shot distance
23.9m
From set pieces
42%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
37%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
14%
Headed
37%
Club role
Ipswich
What they are for
Corners and set piecesSupplies 7% of Ipswich’s dead-ball danger, from 2 deliveries that became shots.
On the pitch23% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Jack Taylor’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Omari Hutchinson0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Jack Clarke0.1 xG3 shots, 1g
Leif Davis0.1 xG4 shots, 0g
Cameron Burgess0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Jaden Philogene-Bidace0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Liam Delap0.6 xG1 shot, 0g
Conor Chaplin0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Cameron Burgess0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Sammie Szmodics0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Season record
2024/25
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Jack Taylor carries 3.5%of Ipswich’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.283
53% of midfielders
Possession value per 900.315
26% of midfielders
Ranked against 137 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
32 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
v Liverpool1 shot 0 on target
v Villa1 shot 1 on target
at West Ham1 shot 0 on target
v Everton2 shots 1 on target
at Forest1 shot 0 on target
v Bournemouth4 shots 1 on target
1g
at Wolves1 shot 1 on target
at Arsenal1 shot 0 on target
at Man Utd1 shot 0 on target
at Bournemouth1 shot 0 on target
at Chelsea1 shot 0 on target
v Arsenal2 shots 0 on target
v Brentford2 shots 0 on target
19 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 19 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.
