+2.07goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.345% of Brighton’s build-up value
league 0.27
Jack Hinshelwood ranks 171st of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 12.6m on average, with 51% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 6% of Brighton’s attacking involvement, the 8th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
104 forwards
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.2440th
Non-penalty goals
0.2443rd
xG
0.1615th
Non-penalty xG
0.1616th
Shots
0.873rd
npxG per shot
0.1878th
Shot distance
12.6m84th
Set-piece share
51%100th
Goals against xG
+1.789th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.1029th
Expected assists
0.078th
Key passes
0.7823rd
npxG + xA
0.235th
xG chain
0.4419th
xG build-up
0.3490th
Assists against xA
+0.680th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
5season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Ranked against 104 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Gameweek 7
Next fixture
Gameweek 7
vsCrystal Palace
Sun 18 Oct, 13:00 UTC
Crystal Palace concede 12.8 shots a match and are 1.09× the league norm against forwards. Roughly an average matchup.
Projected shots
0.90
0.87 per 90 × 1.04
Projected on target
0.43
0.48 per 90 × 0.89
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
26 appearances
Over 0.513 of 2650%± 10
Over 1.53 of 2612%± 6
Over 2.52 of 268%± 5
Over 3.50 of 260%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 13 of 26.
When it mattered4 of 5 goals came with the game level or Brighton behind.
On the pitch54% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Jack Hinshelwood’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Matt O'Riley0.6 xG2 shots, 1g
Jan Paul van Hecke0.3 xG2 shots, 1g
Estupiñán0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
Adam Webster0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
Kaoru Mitoma0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Kaoru Mitoma0.8 xG3 shots, 1g
Diego Gómez0.2 xG1 shot, 0g
Estupiñán0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
João Pedro0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Simon Adingra0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Season record
2024/25
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Jack Hinshelwood carries 5.3%of Brighton’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.345
89% of forwards
Possession value per 900.438
18% of forwards
Ranked against 104 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
26 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
at Arsenal3 shots 1 on target
1g
v Forest1 shot 1 on target
v Spurs1 shot 0 on target
at Newcastle1 shot 0 on target
v Man City1 shot 1 on target
at Forest1 shot 0 on target
1g
at Southampton1 shot 1 on target
at Man City2 shots 0 on target
at Palace1 shot 1 on target
at Brentford1 shot 1 on target
v West Ham1 shot 0 on target
1g
v Liverpool1 shot 1 on target
2g
at Spurs3 shots 3 on target
13 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 13 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.
