-1.17goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.153% of Ipswich’s build-up value
league 0.27
Jack Clarke ranks 132nd of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 18.9m on average. They carry 5% of Ipswich’s attacking involvement, the 7th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
137 midfielders
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.0015th
Non-penalty goals
0.0016th
xG
0.1059th
Non-penalty xG
0.1060th
Shots
1.3365th
npxG per shot
0.0842nd
Shot distance
18.9m58th
Set-piece share
3%6th
Goals against xG
-1.312th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.3196th
Expected assists
0.2182nd
Key passes
2.1994th
npxG + xA
0.3170th
xG chain
0.4352nd
xG build-up
0.159th
Assists against xA
+1.389th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
2season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Ranked against 137 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Gameweek 8
Next fixture
Gameweek 8
vsNottingham Forest
Fri 23 Oct, 19:00 UTC
Nottingham Forest concede 14.0 shots a match and are 1.01× the league norm against midfielders. Roughly an average matchup.
Projected shots
1.38
1.33 per 90 × 1.04
Projected on target
0.15
0.16 per 90 × 0.98
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
32 appearances
Over 0.514 of 3244%± 9
Over 1.53 of 329%± 5
Over 2.50 of 320%± 0
Over 3.50 of 320%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 18 of 32.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Jack Clarke’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Leif Davis0.4 xG4 shots, 0g
Wes Burns0.4 xG1 shot, 0g
Omari Hutchinson0.1 xG3 shots, 0g
Harry Clarke0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Julio Enciso0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Omari Hutchinson0.7 xG4 shots, 1g
George Hirst0.5 xG1 shot, 0g
Conor Chaplin0.5 xG1 shot, 0g
Liam Delap0.4 xG6 shots, 1g
Julio Enciso0.2 xG5 shots, 0g
Season record
2024/25
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Jack Clarke carries 2.7%of Ipswich’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.150
9% of midfielders
Possession value per 900.430
52% of midfielders
Ranked against 137 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
32 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
v Fulham2 shots 0 on target
at Brighton1 shot 0 on target
v Villa2 shots 0 on target
v Everton1 shot 0 on target
at Spurs1 shot 0 on target
at Forest1 shot 1 on target
v Bournemouth1 shot 0 on target
at Wolves1 shot 0 on target
at Fulham1 shot 0 on target
v Spurs1 shot 1 on target
at Palace1 shot 0 on target
at Chelsea1 shot 0 on target
at Leicester1 shot 0 on target
v West Ham2 shots 0 on target
18 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 18 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.