Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Iyenoma Destiny Udogie

Defender23 yrs
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.020 non-penalty goals from 5 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.061 assists, 16 key passes
Finishing
-0.32goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.427% of Tottenham’s build-up value

Iyenoma Destiny Udogie ranks 300th of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 31.0m on average.

Against their position

123 defenders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.00
Non-penalty goals
0.00
xG
0.02
Non-penalty xG
0.02
Shots
0.23
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
-0.3

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.05
Expected assists
0.06
Key passes
0.74
npxG + xA
0.07
xG chain
0.45
xG build-up
0.42
Assists against xA
-0.3

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
2season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Ranked against 123 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 7

Next fixture

Gameweek 7

vs Coventry

Mon 19 Oct, 19:00 UTC

No shot record for Coventry in this season, so no opponent adjustment is possible. Newly promoted sides have no Premier League history to measure.

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

25 appearances
  • Over 0.55 of 2520%± 8
  • Over 1.51 of 254%± 4
  • Over 2.50 of 250%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 250%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 20 of 25.

Shooting profile

5 shots

Where they shoot

5 shots
67% of shots, 4 shots17% of shots, 1 shot67%17%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

Iyenoma Destiny Udogie, 2024/25, final 35m. A further 17% of their shots came from outside this window.

left
84%
Centre
16%
right
0%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.070
Shots per 90
0.23
Key passes per 90
0.74
Average shot distance
31.0m
From set pieces
0%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%

Club role

Tottenham

What they are for

  • On the pitch57% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Iyenoma Destiny Udogie’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Son Heung-Min0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  2. Dejan Kulusevski0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Timo Werner0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Son Heung-Min0.3 xG6 shots, 0g
  2. James Maddison0.3 xG2 shots, 0g
  3. Brennan Johnson0.2 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Dominic Solanke0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  5. Mathys Tel0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2024/25

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Iyenoma Destiny Udogie carries 7.4% of Tottenham’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.424
    80% of defenders
  • Possession value per 900.454
    76% of defenders

Ranked against 123 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

25 appearances, oldest first

v Brentford1 shot
0 on target

at Man Utd2 shots
0 on target

at Brighton1 shot
1 on target

v West Ham1 shot
0 on target

at Liverpool1 shot
0 on target

20 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 20 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.