-2.80goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.071% of Brentford’s build-up value
league 0.28
Ivan Toney ranks 45th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 17.7m on average, with 33% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 7% of Brentford’s attacking involvement, the 7th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
107 forwards
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.2543rd
Non-penalty goals
0.2547th
xG
0.4469th
Non-penalty xG
0.4476th
Shots
3.1779th
npxG per shot
0.1459th
Shot distance
17.7m29th
Set-piece share
33%86th
Goals against xG
-3.111th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.1242nd
Expected assists
0.1439th
Key passes
0.8115th
npxG + xA
0.5862nd
xG chain
0.4828th
xG build-up
0.076th
Assists against xA
-0.254th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
5season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Ranked against 107 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Gameweek 8
Next fixture
Gameweek 8
away toHull
Sun 25 Oct, 14:00 UTC
No shot record for Hull in this season, so no opponent adjustment is possible. Newly promoted sides have no Premier League history to measure.
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
17 appearances
Over 0.516 of 1794%± 6
Over 1.513 of 1776%± 10
Over 2.58 of 1747%± 12
Over 3.54 of 1724%± 10
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 1 of 17.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Ivan Toney, 2023/24, 50 shots in the final 35m, 4 scored.
left
28%
Centre
35%
right
37%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.140
Shots per 90
3.17
Key passes per 90
0.81
Average shot distance
17.7m
From set pieces
33%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
18%
Through balls
12%
Own dribble
13%
Headed
12%
Club role
Brentford
What they are for
When it mattered3 of 4 goals came with the game level or Brentford behind.
On the pitch42% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Ivan Toney’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Mathias Jensen1.0 xG8 shots, 0g
Neal Maupay0.9 xG4 shots, 0g
Bryan Mbeumo0.6 xG3 shots, 0g
Vitaly Janelt0.6 xG6 shots, 1g
Mads Roerslev0.5 xG1 shot, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Yoane Wissa0.9 xG6 shots, 1g
Kristoffer Ajer0.5 xG1 shot, 1g
Keane Lewis-Potter0.4 xG1 shot, 0g
Bryan Mbeumo0.2 xG2 shots, 0g
Sergio Reguilón0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Season record
2023/24
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Ivan Toney carries 1.3%of Brentford’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.069
6% of forwards
Possession value per 900.476
27% of forwards
Ranked against 107 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
17 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
1g
v Forest1 shot 1 on target
1g
at Spurs5 shots 3 on target
v Man City2 shots 0 on target
1g
at Wolves2 shots 2 on target
1g
v Liverpool8 shots 4 on target
at Man City2 shots 0 on target
at West Ham3 shots 1 on target
v Chelsea1 shot 0 on target
at Arsenal1 shot 1 on target
at Burnley3 shots 2 on target
v Man Utd9 shots 0 on target
v Brighton2 shots 1 on target
at Everton3 shots 2 on target
v Fulham2 shots 1 on target
at Bournemouth3 shots 1 on target
v Newcastle4 shots 2 on target
1 blankno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so one sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.
