Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Ismaila Sarr

Midfielder28 yrs
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.408 non-penalty goals from 59 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.336 assists, 44 key passes
Finishing
-3.10goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.248% of Crystal Palace’s build-up value

Ismaila Sarr ranks 14th of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 13.8m on average. They carry 18% of Crystal Palace’s attacking involvement, the largest share in the squad.

Against their position

104 forwards

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.26
Non-penalty goals
0.26
xG
0.40
Non-penalty xG
0.40
Shots
1.94
npxG per shot
0.21
Shot distance
13.8m
Set-piece share
18%
Goals against xG
-4.3

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.20
Expected assists
0.33
Key passes
1.45
npxG + xA
0.74
xG chain
0.80
xG build-up
0.24
Assists against xA
-4.1

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
4season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Ranked against 104 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 7

Next fixture

Gameweek 7

away to Brighton

Sun 18 Oct, 13:00 UTC

Brighton concede 11.3 shots a match and are 1.00× the league norm against forwards. Roughly an average matchup.

Projected shots
1.81

1.94 per 90 × 0.93

Projected on target
0.83

0.95 per 90 × 0.87

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

38 appearances
  • Over 0.525 of 3866%± 8
  • Over 1.516 of 3842%± 8
  • Over 2.510 of 3826%± 7
  • Over 3.56 of 3816%± 6

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 13 of 38.

Shooting profile

59 shots

Where they shoot

59 shots
2% of shots, 1 shot12% of shots, 7 shots2% of shots, 1 shot15% of shots, 9 shots8% of shots, 5 shots7% of shots, 4 shots2% of shots, 1 shot12% of shots, 7 shots7% of shots, 4 shots14% of shots, 8 shots2% of shots, 1 shot2% of shots, 1 shot2% of shots, 1 shot5% of shots, 3 shots2% of shots, 1 shot2% of shots, 1 shot5% of shots, 3 shots12%15%8%7%12%7%14%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

Ismaila Sarr, 2024/25, final 35m. A further 2% of their shots came from outside this window.

left
14%
Centre
51%
right
36%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.209
Shots per 90
1.94
Key passes per 90
1.45
Average shot distance
13.8m
From set pieces
18%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
19%
Through balls
10%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
24%

Club role

Crystal Palace

What they are for

  • Open-play crosses6 crosses from open play became shots, worth 1.80 xG.
  • Corners and set piecesSupplies 8% of Crystal Palace’s dead-ball danger, from 5 deliveries that became shots.
  • When it mattered5 of 8 goals came with the game level or Crystal Palace behind.
  • On the pitch80% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Ismaila Sarr’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Tyrick Mitchell1.6 xG6 shots, 3g
  2. Jean-Philippe Mateta1.4 xG6 shots, 1g
  3. Daniel Muñoz1.1 xG9 shots, 1g
  4. Ben Chilwell0.7 xG2 shots, 0g
  5. Adam Wharton0.6 xG3 shots, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Jean-Philippe Mateta3.1 xG10 shots, 1g
  2. Eberechi Eze1.7 xG9 shots, 2g
  3. Eddie Nketiah1.6 xG6 shots, 1g
  4. Daniel Muñoz1.3 xG5 shots, 0g
  5. Justin Devenny0.8 xG2 shots, 1g

Season record

2024/25

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Ismaila Sarr carries 7.7% of Crystal Palace’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.240
    65% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.797
    85% of forwards

Ranked against 104 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

38 appearances, oldest first

v West Ham1 shot
0 on target

v Leicester1 shot
0 on target

v Man Utd2 shots
1 on target

v Liverpool1 shot
1 on target

v Spurs2 shots
2 on target

at Wolves4 shots
2 on target

1g

at Villa4 shots
3 on target

v Newcastle2 shots
2 on target

v Man City1 shot
0 on target

2g

at Brighton5 shots
3 on target

1g

v Arsenal5 shots
3 on target

at Bournemouth1 shot
1 on target

v Southampton3 shots
1 on target

at Leicester1 shot
1 on target

at Man Utd1 shot
0 on target

v Everton2 shots
0 on target

2g

v Villa4 shots
3 on target

1g

v Ipswich3 shots
1 on target

at Man City1 shot
0 on target

at Newcastle1 shot
0 on target

at Arsenal3 shots
0 on target

v Forest2 shots
1 on target

at Spurs4 shots
0 on target

v Wolves3 shots
2 on target

1g

at Liverpool2 shots
2 on target

13 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 13 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.