-1.42goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.382% of Chelsea’s build-up value
league 0.24
Estêvão ranks 11th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 16.3m on average. They carry 5% of Chelsea’s attacking involvement, the 10th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
109 forwards
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.2145th
Non-penalty goals
0.2150th
xG
0.4167th
Non-penalty xG
0.4173rd
Shots
2.9589th
npxG per shot
0.1455th
Shot distance
16.3m48th
Set-piece share
1%2nd
Goals against xG
-1.926th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.2185th
Expected assists
0.3096th
Key passes
1.6982nd
npxG + xA
0.7192nd
xG chain
0.9897th
xG build-up
0.3891st
Assists against xA
-0.837th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Defending
per 90
Recoveries
3.8635th
Defensive contribution
6.0117th
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
4season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Ranked against 109 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end. Recoveries and defensive contribution come from the FPL feed and are ranked in its own positions.
This week
Gameweek 8
Next fixture
Gameweek 8
vsTottenham
Sat 24 Oct, 16:30 UTC
Tottenham concede 12.3 shots a match and are 1.05× the league norm against forwards. Roughly an average matchup.
Projected shots
2.99
2.95 per 90 × 1.01
Projected on target
0.82
0.84 per 90 × 0.98
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
22 appearances
Over 0.514 of 2264%± 10
Over 1.59 of 2241%± 10
Over 2.53 of 2214%± 7
Over 3.52 of 229%± 6
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 8 of 22.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Estêvão’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Marc Cucurella0.8 xG3 shots, 1g
João Pedro0.7 xG5 shots, 0g
Enzo Fernández0.5 xG2 shots, 0g
Reece James0.5 xG2 shots, 0g
Cole Palmer0.3 xG4 shots, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Enzo Fernández1.2 xG6 shots, 1g
João Pedro0.8 xG5 shots, 1g
Marc Guiu0.7 xG2 shots, 0g
Pedro Neto0.2 xG2 shots, 0g
Reece James0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Season record
2025/26
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Estêvão carries 2.2%of Chelsea’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.378
91% of forwards
Possession value per 900.977
96% of forwards
Ranked against 109 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
22 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
v Palace1 shot 0 on target
at West Ham1 shot 1 on target
v Fulham1 shot 1 on target
v Brighton3 shots 0 on target
1g
v Liverpool2 shots 2 on target
at Forest2 shots 0 on target
v Sunderland1 shot 0 on target
v Arsenal2 shots 0 on target
at Leeds2 shots 0 on target
v Bournemouth4 shots 1 on target
at Man City1 shot 0 on target
1g
at Palace4 shots 2 on target
v Leeds2 shots 0 on target
v Man Utd2 shots 1 on target
8 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 8 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.