-0.31goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.3710% of Sunderland’s build-up value
league 0.30
Enzo Le Fée ranks 28th of 138 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 23.0m on average, with 85% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 15% of Sunderland’s attacking involvement, the 2nd largest share in the squad.
Against their position
87 midfielders
Average match rating6.8855th
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.1763rd
Non-penalty goals
0.0029th
xG
0.3288th
Non-penalty xG
0.0633rd
Shots
1.8967th
Shots on target
0.6773rd
Shot accuracy
–not ranked
npxG per shot
0.031st
Shot distance
23.0m13th
Set-piece share
85%98th
Goals against xG
-0.330th
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.1764th
Expected assists
0.3991st
Key passes
1.8972nd
npxG + xA
0.4573rd
xG chain
0.6767th
xG build-up
0.3761st
Assists against xA
-1.310th
On the ball
per 90
Touches
53.0051st
Passes
34.3347th
Pass completion
80%20th
Take-ons attempted
3.3384th
Take-on success
40%62nd
Dispossessed
0.6751st
Defending
per 90
Tackles
4.0090th
Tackles won
50%7th
Interceptions
0.3335th
Clearances
0.0010th
Aerials won
1.0079th
Aerial success
–not ranked
Dribbled past
2.004th
Discipline
per 90
Fouls committed
0.3383rd
Caught offside
0.3321st
Errors
0season count
Yellow cards
0season count
Red cards
0season count
Ranked against 87 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Gameweek 7
Next fixture
Gameweek 7
away toBournemouth
Sun 18 Oct, 13:00 UTC
Bournemouth concede 10.8 shots a match and are 0.95× the league norm against central attack (23 shots so far). A difficult one.
Projected shots
1.63
1.89 per 90 × 0.86
Projected on target
0.50
0.51 per 90 × 0.97
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
6 appearances
Over 0.54 of 667%± 19
Over 1.53 of 650%± 20
Over 2.53 of 650%± 20
Over 3.51 of 617%± 15
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 2 of 6.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Enzo Le Fée, 2026/27, 10 shots in the final 35m, 1 scored.
left
10%
Centre
82%
right
9%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.170
Shots per 90
1.89
Key passes per 90
1.89
Average shot distance
23.0m
From set pieces
85%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
0%
Through balls
29%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%
Club role
Sunderland
What they are for
PenaltiesTakes them: 2 of 2 Sunderland were awarded.
Corners and set piecesSupplies 14% of Sunderland’s dead-ball danger, from 2 deliveries that became shots.
On the pitch97% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Enzo Le Fée’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Granit Xhaka0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Brian Brobbey0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Nilson Angulo0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Noah Sadiki0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Wilson Isidor0.7 xG3 shots, 0g
Brian Brobbey0.5 xG2 shots, 1g
Nordi Mukiele0.5 xG1 shot, 0g
Nilson Angulo0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
Kevin Danso0.2 xG1 shot, 0g
Season record
2026/27
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Enzo Le Fée carries 9.8%of Sunderland’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.372
56% of midfielders
Possession value per 900.672
62% of midfielders
Ranked against 52 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
6 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
v Fulham4 shots 1 on target
1g
at Brentford3 shots 1 on target
v Arsenal3 shots 1 on target
v Brighton1 shot 0 on target
2 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 2 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.